Re: ADSC ??

Article View: adobe.postscript.programming

Article #1192

Back to adobe.postscript.programming Previous Next

#1192

From: Carlo Fontanesi
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:43

3 lines
1012 bytes

I think so, too... unlucky I can't decide to chenage it! :o(
But do you think that "Archive Format" is better? I don't know the differences...
I Saw that in "optimized for portability" a string with the page size is present, not in the "Archive format"- I think that's why "my" service bureaus" have difficult.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1de864f9.4@WebX.la2eafNXanI>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!eusc.inter.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX

References: <1de864f9.-1@WebX.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10c61a,6088c8e02e95be7c
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c61a,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-24 05:24:06 PST
From: "Carlo Fontanesi" <c.fontanesi@libero.it>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!eusc.inter.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX
Newsgroups: adobe.postscript.programming
Subject: Re: ADSC ??
Message-ID: <1de864f9.4@WebX.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 04:43:14 -0800
References: <1de864f9.-1@WebX.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message