Re: Forms, PaintProc, and caching

Article View: adobe.postscript.programming

Article #611

Back to adobe.postscript.programming Previous Next

#611

From: Aandi_Inston
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 08:52

10 lines
1035 bytes

>But surely Adobe could confirm 

Perhaps they could, if someone from Adobe happens to come to the
forum.

A programmer should never rely on cacheing, and need never rely on
cacheing, surely?  It's a performance issue.  It isn't even meaningful
to cache in some cases, such as in Acrobat Distiller.

Aandi Inston

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4049911b.1874532304@adobeforums.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx

References: <2cd07494.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI> <2cd07494.3@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10c61a,f0b6c77ef4fec908
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c61a,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-06 01:07:40 PST
From: Aandi_Inston@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx
Newsgroups: adobe.postscript.programming
Subject: Re: Forms, PaintProc, and caching
Message-ID: <4049911b.1874532304@adobeforums.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 00:52:55 -0800
References: <2cd07494.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI> <2cd07494.3@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 10
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message