Re: Forms, PaintProc, and caching

Article View: adobe.postscript.programming

Article #613

Back to adobe.postscript.programming Previous Next

#613

From: Aandi_Inston
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 15:05

10 lines
1155 bytes

Adobe have published at least one tech note talking about form
cacheing and its advantages; I even seem to recall performance
comparisons.   So I think it is safe to assume that many Adobe RIP
products do cache forms.

I still think it may be a simple matter of semantics. Are you sure the
vendor didn't mean "our Adobe PostScript RIP" rather than "all Adobe
PostScript RIPs"?  Why would they talk about anyone else's?

Aandi Inston

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4049e86a.1896882693@adobeforums.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx

References: <2cd07494.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI> <2cd07494.5@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10c61a,f0b6c77ef4fec908
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c61a,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-06 07:07:46 PST
From: Aandi_Inston@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx
Newsgroups: adobe.postscript.programming
Subject: Re: Forms, PaintProc, and caching
Message-ID: <4049e86a.1896882693@adobeforums.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 07:05:54 -0800
References: <2cd07494.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI> <2cd07494.5@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 10
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message