Re: Mac vs. PC for graphics

Article View: adobe.print.design

Article #3216

Back to adobe.print.design Previous Next

#3216

From: BobLevine
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:22

14 lines
1242 bytes

Again, you prove that it's nothing but personal preference.

If your clients are using lousy monitors I can understand their awe, 
however, the XP interface is neither "cloying" nor "clumpy." In fact, I 
find it very intuitive. Do you know why? Because I took the time to 
learn it.

My printers have no problem RIPing my files, my clients have no problems 
with my work.

And another thing, you lose all credibility spelling it windoze. Or 
don't you know how to spell?

Bob

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6F90DF0565825C3DA1A6B1358B393A72@in.webx.la2eafNXanI>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.moat.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx

References: <2cd11152.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI> <2cd11152.46@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1129af,a979bc7e30f2a49b
X-Google-Attributes: gid1129af,public
From: Bob_Levine
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.moat.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx
Newsgroups: adobe.print.design
Subject: Re: Mac vs. PC for graphics
Message-ID: <6F90DF0565825C3DA1A6B1358B393A72@in.webx.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:22:54 -0700
References: <2cd11152.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI> <2cd11152.46@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 17
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message