Article View: adobe.print.design
Article #369Re: Offset vs Inkjet - A Question of Gamut
From: Neil_Keller
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:12
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:12
7 lines
1091 bytes
1091 bytes
levonk. Nope. I may need reading glasses now, but no glasses for anything else! <g> As I said earlier, I was disputing a previous poster's contention that 133 lpi was not "undetectable". I have no problem seeing 133-150 line screens with my off-the-rack drugstore glasses in good light. As a side comment, even though 175-200 lpi are more common now, I don't think there is any advantage to creating s/s art at 350-400 ppi. Neil
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<59b70fd5.15@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossingReferences:
<59b70fd5.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1129af,4473da6982af36e8 X-Google-Attributes: gid1129af,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Neil_Keller@adobeforums.com Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing Newsgroups: adobe.print.design Subject: Re: Offset vs Inkjet - A Question of Gamut Message-ID: <59b70fd5.15@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:12:21 -0800 References: <59b70fd5.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Original-Lines: 11