Re: Adobe Reader 9.1 Distributable

Article View: adobe.reader

Article #623

#623

From: johnream
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:59

9 lines
1192 bytes

Quick question about those FTP Files... has Adobe reversed the file naming/contents logic? STD vs non-STD

In the earlier 9.0 file area, the STD file is much *smaller* then the non-STD file. I used the STF file to build my local installer because this one didn't did include any of the AIR stuff.
    ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/win/9.x/9.0/enu/

Now, In the new 9.1 file area, the STD file is much *larger* then the non-STD file.
   ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/win/9.x/9.1/enu/

Looks reversed to me.... anyone know if we should be using the 9.1 non-STD file if we don't want AIR?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <59b82f27.8@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing

References: <59b82f27.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10273d,34dae810649fd58d
X-Google-Attributes: gid10273d,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: johnream@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.reader
Subject: Re: Adobe Reader 9.1 Distributable
Message-ID: <59b82f27.8@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:59:14 -0700
References: <59b82f27.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message