Re: VB.Net and InDesign CS different then InDesign 2.0

Article View: adobe.scripting.indesign

Article #15062

Back to adobe.scripting.indesign Previous Next

#15062

From: Shane_Stanley
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:11

14 lines
1194 bytes

On Dec 16, 2003, at 8:49 AM, James Mahood wrote:

> Adobe could have maintained backwards compatibility by providing two 
> interfaces to InDesign CS.

And Microsoft could have provided a single cross-platform SDK, but they 
didn't bother.

It's largely a question of allocation of resources. Moreover, bigger 
changes are more likely to be needed with relatively immature apps, and 
I think InDesign v2 fitted that description.

--
Shane Stanley <sstanley@myriad-com.com.au>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <998AE1AA-2F4B-11D8-A308-003065D61B90@myriad-com.com.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx

References: <2ccec5cf.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f939a,28e19235f1e28fa8
X-Google-Attributes: gidf939a,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-15 14:08:11 PST
From: Shane_Stanley@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx
Newsgroups: adobe.scripting.indesign
Subject: Re: VB.Net and InDesign CS different then InDesign 2.0
Message-ID: <998AE1AA-2F4B-11D8-A308-003065D61B90@myriad-com.com.au>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:11:15 -0800
References: <2ccec5cf.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 17
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message