Article View: adobe.scripting.indesign
Article #16607Clipping Mask in placed file versus masking in ID2
From: Ronald Lanham
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 03:04
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 03:04
7 lines
1148 bytes
1148 bytes
My client seems to think he'd like some maps that are done in AI10 masked using Clipping Masks in AI and then placed as AI files in ID2. Is there any advantage at all to using Clipping Masks in AI versus simply masking them in ID2 by reducing the size of the image frame? Either way the AI file is still going to be the same size (MB size that is). TIA for feedback.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1dea58d8.-1@WebX.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!diablo.theplanet.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.arcor-online.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebXShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f939a,a27c932b0b93e406,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf939a,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-15 20:07:59 PST From: "Ronald Lanham" <lanham@theimagecache.com> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!diablo.theplanet.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.arcor-online.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX Newsgroups: adobe.scripting.indesign Subject: Clipping Mask in placed file versus masking in ID2 Message-ID: <1dea58d8.-1@WebX.la2eafNXanI> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 20:04:47 -0700 Lines: 10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit