Re: [CS4 JS] Scripting Indexes

Article View: adobe.scripting.indesign

Article #1796

Back to adobe.scripting.indesign Previous Next

#1796

From: Harbs
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:57

13 lines
1073 bytes

Ole,

Are you sure that collapsing the undo stack really increases performance?

My understanding is that the undos are still recorded the same way, but 
they are just collapsed into one general item in the undo stack. If 
anything, there should be more overhead (collapsing them) -- not less.

I guess I should really do performance tests to find out...

-- 
Harbs
http://www.in-tools.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <65D54BA8A96EF1A0DAE7D126592F09F0@in.webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing

References: <59b7ae01.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> <59b7ae01.1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: f939a,6b07b633d95c342d
X-Google-Attributes: gidf939a,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Harbs
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.scripting.indesign
Subject: Re: [CS4 JS] Scripting Indexes
Message-ID: <65D54BA8A96EF1A0DAE7D126592F09F0@in.webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:57:29 -0800
References: <59b7ae01.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> <59b7ae01.1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 16
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message