Article View: adobe.scripting.indesign
Article #2048Re: [JS] :: [CSX] - PageItem Stacking Order
From: Harbs
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:45
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:45
11 lines
1090 bytes
1090 bytes
Hi Peter, Yes, you are correct. I was looking at the timing data in the ESTK, and I forgot to take the overhead of slice(0) into account. Without doing further testing, it looks like slice(0) doesn't hurt but it doesn't help either (for arrays created by getElements() ). -- Harbs http://www.in-tools.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<430BAAAF14D6DAE3E1CBA692002675AF@in.webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossingReferences:
<59b767cf.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> <59b767cf.16@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f939a,5dfad1e4d169194d X-Google-Attributes: gidf939a,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Harbs Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing Newsgroups: adobe.scripting.indesign Subject: Re: [JS] :: [CSX] - PageItem Stacking Order Message-ID: <430BAAAF14D6DAE3E1CBA692002675AF@in.webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 03:45:58 -0800 References: <59b767cf.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> <59b767cf.16@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 13 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit