🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: adobe.scripting.indesign
Article #2048

Re: [JS] :: [CSX] - PageItem Stacking Order

#2048
From: Harbs
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:45
11 lines
1090 bytes
Hi Peter,

Yes, you are correct. I was looking at the timing data in the ESTK, and 
I forgot to take the overhead of slice(0) into account.

Without doing further testing, it looks like slice(0) doesn't hurt but 
it doesn't help either (for arrays created by getElements() ).

-- 
Harbs
http://www.in-tools.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <430BAAAF14D6DAE3E1CBA692002675AF@in.webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
References: <59b767cf.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> <59b767cf.16@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f939a,5dfad1e4d169194d
X-Google-Attributes: gidf939a,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Harbs
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.scripting.indesign
Subject: Re: [JS] :: [CSX] - PageItem Stacking Order
Message-ID: <430BAAAF14D6DAE3E1CBA692002675AF@in.webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 03:45:58 -0800
References: <59b767cf.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> <59b767cf.16@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 13
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit