Article View: adobe.scripting.indesign
Article #20734Re: Indesign or quark
From: Olav Kvern
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:34
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:34
7 lines
1136 bytes
1136 bytes
Benny-- To which I would add: on the Mac OS, InDesign scripting is better (less buggy, more complete) than QuarkXPress' scripting; in Windows, QuarkXPress is not scriptable at all (which makes InDesign a no-brainer choice for anyone wanting to automate page layout on that platform). Thanks, Ole
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ef90c27.2@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-05!supernews.com!feed.textport.net!news-out.nuthinbutnews.com!propagator-sterling!news-in.nuthinbutnews.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!opentransit.net!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebXReferences:
<ef90c27.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f939a,3f9cf1abc10d74f7 X-Google-Attributes: gidf939a,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-12 17:40:02 PST From: "Olav Kvern" <okvern@adobe.com> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-05!supernews.com!feed.textport.net!news-out.nuthinbutnews.com!propagator-sterling!news-in.nuthinbutnews.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!opentransit.net!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX Newsgroups: adobe.scripting.indesign Subject: Re: Indesign or quark Message-ID: <ef90c27.2@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 17:34:15 -0700 References: <ef90c27.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Lines: 10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit