Article View: adobe.scripting.indesign
Article #2115Re: [JS] :: [CSX] - PageItem Stacking Order
From: Peter Kahrel
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:29
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:29
23 lines
999 bytes
999 bytes
I think all new temp groups should be labeled and only these groups should
be ungrouped
Good point. The line that creates the groups should then be
doc.pages[i].groups.add ([dupl, p_items[j]], {label: 'dupl_group'});
and the line that ungroups should then be
doc.groups.item('dupl_group').ungroup();
Peter
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<59b767cf.5@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news4us.nl!webcrossingReferences:
<59b767cf.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f939a,5dfad1e4d169194d X-Google-Attributes: gidf939a,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: "Peter Kahrel" <kahrel@kahrel.plus.com> Newsgroups: adobe.scripting.indesign Subject: Re: [JS] :: [CSX] - PageItem Stacking Order Message-ID: <59b767cf.5@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 07:29:55 -0800 References: <59b767cf.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news4us.nl!webcrossing