Re: [CS3] Need an advice : pure XML, pure Javascript or both ?

Article View: adobe.scripting.indesign

Article #566

Back to adobe.scripting.indesign Previous Next

#566

From: E_G_R
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:29

5 lines
1141 bytes

Hi:

Correct, InDesign tagged text has always been deliberately crippled to prevent processing graphics/inline frames. :( In practice I don't find this to be a problem, however. Using a db as a proxy system offers other benefits besides simple document construction, of course, such as true automation, pagination/content reports, managerial/sales/accounting participation, rule enforcement/notification, elimination of certain types of errors, better re-purposing of content, etc.

egr

Technical Details

Message-ID: <59b83648.3@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing

References: <59b83648.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: f939a,1e34d5c938a1b6a0
X-Google-Attributes: gidf939a,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: E_G_R@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.scripting.indesign
Subject: Re: [CS3] Need an advice : pure XML, pure Javascript or both ?
Message-ID: <59b83648.3@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:29:06 -0700
References: <59b83648.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message