Re: Europa Grotesk Regular Extended -- need substitute

Article View: adobe.typography

Article #1092

#1092

From: Neil_Keller
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 19:51

7 lines
917 bytes

Gary,

I know it's late, but that font looks like a close knockoff of Helvetica Extended. But the problem is if the client is that fussy about the font, then the danger is that a substitute might not be acceptable for a proof.

Again, just some Monday morning quarterbacking here -- no need to respond.

Neil

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3bc3f237.5@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ecp.fr!news.stben.net!webcrossing

References: <3bc3f237.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1042b6,9e6d5b7202fb2906
X-Google-Attributes: gid1042b6,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Neil_Keller@adobeforums.com
Newsgroups: adobe.typography
Subject: Re: Europa Grotesk Regular Extended -- need substitute
Message-ID: <3bc3f237.5@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:51:52 -0700
References: <3bc3f237.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ecp.fr!news.stben.net!webcrossing

Reply to Parent Message