Article View: adobe.typography
Article #12390Re: Revivals, Knockoffs & Plagiarism
From: Andrew Bokelman
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 16:49
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 16:49
4 lines
1063 bytes
1063 bytes
It does look like the goal was to make their own version of Gil Sans. The thing I find interesting is that Humanist 521 seems to work better for me. The "caps with attitude" (as I call them) seem to be done better in Humanist 512.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MPG.1767e0e09eca4ca698968e@www.adobeforums.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.gamma.ru!Gamma.RU!opentransit.net!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebXReferences:
<ef7f01f.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> <ef7f01f.15@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1042b6,aec1fe544831a6a3 X-Google-Attributes: gid1042b6,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-05 10:09:29 PST From: Andrew Bokelman <andrew@avoidingspam.com> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.gamma.ru!Gamma.RU!opentransit.net!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX Newsgroups: adobe.typography Subject: Re: Revivals, Knockoffs & Plagiarism Message-ID: <MPG.1767e0e09eca4ca698968e@www.adobeforums.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 09:49:09 -0700 References: <ef7f01f.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> <ef7f01f.15@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Lines: 6 X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit