Article View: adobe.typography
Article #12451Re: Logos & type sizes
From: David Person
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 23:51
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 23:51
5 lines
1273 bytes
1273 bytes
Neil, you are entirely correct. I typically omit a logo from a proposal or document if I can't find a high-quality version, but many people disagree with me. (Not many on this forum I bet, but many people you deal with in business.) My own personal gripe is companies like Intel, who somehow believe that if they restrict usage of their proper marks (by not providing good copies easily) that will somehow solve the problem of mark misuse. I don't think that's true, and it sure makes it harder to actually use a mark *properly*.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ef8c516.10@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!peer.news.opaltelecom.net!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!eusc.inter.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebXReferences:
<ef8c516.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1042b6,a261ad629678e62f X-Google-Attributes: gid1042b6,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-03 17:07:36 PST From: "David Person" <david.lists@antares-sf.com> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!peer.news.opaltelecom.net!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!eusc.inter.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX Newsgroups: adobe.typography Subject: Re: Logos & type sizes Message-ID: <ef8c516.10@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 16:51:24 -0700 References: <ef8c516.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Lines: 11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit