Article View: adobe.typography
Article #12556Re: Hyphens, Ens or Ems?
From: Don McCahill
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 13:05
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 13:05
5 lines
988 bytes
988 bytes
Re: Gutenberg seems to have been hit by inflation - it was previously the 42-line Bible! So that's what happened to the Eleventh Commandment. "Thou shalt not practise bad typography." <grin>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ef8a431.19@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!peer1-sjc1.usenetserver.com!usenetserver.com!cyclone.bc.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!news-x2.support.nl!newsfeed.freenet.de!eusc.inter.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebXReferences:
<ef8a431.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1042b6,84eecf0b295b91d3 X-Google-Attributes: gid1042b6,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-23 06:07:30 PST From: "Don McCahill" <donmcc@rogers.com> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!peer1-sjc1.usenetserver.com!usenetserver.com!cyclone.bc.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!news-x2.support.nl!newsfeed.freenet.de!eusc.inter.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX Newsgroups: adobe.typography Subject: Re: Hyphens, Ens or Ems? Message-ID: <ef8a431.19@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 06:05:36 -0700 References: <ef8a431.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Lines: 7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit