Re: Name that font! Round 2

Article View: adobe.typography

Article #1410

#1410

From: Kyle_Sessions
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:58

12 lines
1166 bytes


      Personally, I would prefer the sheer convenience of an across-the-board
      simplification of type foundry EULAs to allow for the short-term/temporary
      transfer of fonts to legitimate service provider businesses (with the
      promise of destruction upon output; but not to colleagues, friends, or
      clients.




That would make sense to me. One thing that I can't figure out: if you have a font that is so restricted that you cannot even legally embed it in a PDF file, what's the point? You can't use it for anything! At least, not anything productive!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3bc3a0c7.14@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.germany.com!news.ecp.fr!news.stben.net!webcrossing

References: <3bc3a0c7.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1042b6,a0c231b6af453057
X-Google-Attributes: gid1042b6,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Kyle_Sessions@adobeforums.com
Newsgroups: adobe.typography
Subject: Re: Name that font! Round 2
Message-ID: <3bc3a0c7.14@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:58:36 -0700
References: <3bc3a0c7.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.germany.com!news.ecp.fr!news.stben.net!webcrossing

Reply to Parent Message