🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: adobe.typography
Article #1604

Re: Adobe vs Linotype

#1604
From: Neil_Keller
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:49
7 lines
935 bytes
umucl,

As Bob says. Also, as Adobe licenses some of the Adobe library for inclusion in its own, just be sure that you do not have identically-named fonts installed and activated from both foundries.

You can use fonts from any well-respected foundry, large or small, with your Adobe applications, Type 1, TrueType, or OpenType, with the same caveat.

Neil
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3bc319b0.1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.germany.com!news.isoc.lu!webcrossing
References: <3bc319b0.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1042b6,c70326f552269ae
X-Google-Attributes: gid1042b6,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Neil_Keller@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.germany.com!news.isoc.lu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.typography
Subject: Re: Adobe vs Linotype
Message-ID: <3bc319b0.1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 05:49:48 -0800
References: <3bc319b0.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit