Article View: adobe.typography
Article #1611Re: Adobe vs Linotype
From: Dov Isaacs
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:37
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:37
5 lines
723 bytes
723 bytes
Neil, Your response is correct! - Dov
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3bc319b0.6@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nwr.nac.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.albasani.net!news.isoc.lu!webcrossingReferences:
<3bc319b0.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1042b6,c70326f552269ae X-Google-Attributes: gid1042b6,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: "Dov Isaacs" <isaacs@adobe.com> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nwr.nac.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.albasani.net!news.isoc.lu!webcrossing Newsgroups: adobe.typography Subject: Re: Adobe vs Linotype Message-ID: <3bc319b0.6@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:37:09 -0800 References: <3bc319b0.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit