Re: Whatever happened to Kepler?

Article View: adobe.typography

Article #220

#220

From: Thomas_Phinney
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:19

7 lines
925 bytes

Yes, that's exactly what happened. He took advantage of the fact that Adobe doesn't claim compatibility between the OpenType version and the old MM version to revise it a bit.

At the time, I thought it would be useful to write this stuff up. See <http://www.adobe.com/type/opentype/T1_to_OTF_FAQ.htm> for details on compatibility.

Cheers,

T

Technical Details

Message-ID: <59b85e69.1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing

References: <59b85e69.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1042b6,a8158ee97334c98f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1042b6,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Thomas_Phinney@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.typography
Subject: Re: Whatever happened to Kepler?
Message-ID: <59b85e69.1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:19:19 -0700
References: <59b85e69.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message