FontAgent Pro vs ATM Deluxe

Article View: adobe.typography

Article #523

#523

From: Sandy_J
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:52

1 lines
948 bytes

I know WinXP allows more active fonts than Win2000 did, but I'd like to have a huge amount of fonts installed that I can activate and deactivate. Used to use ATM Deluxe on Win2000, and still have disk. I use FontAgent Pro on the Mac at work (love it!) and I know they have a Windows version. I'd like opinions from users on which they prefer, and if ATM works properly on WinXP. I know development on ATM is dead.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3c060c51.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!news.ecp.fr!news.stben.net!webcrossing

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1042b6,f2420921184db625,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1042b6,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Sandy_J@adobeforums.com
Newsgroups: adobe.typography
Subject: FontAgent Pro vs ATM Deluxe
Message-ID: <3c060c51.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:52:46 -0800
Lines: 6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!news.ecp.fr!news.stben.net!webcrossing