Re: FontAgent Pro vs ATM Deluxe

Article View: adobe.typography

Article #526

#526

From: Neil_Keller
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:43

12 lines
1107 bytes

Sandy, 

      I know WinXP allows more active fonts than Win2000 did




As a Mac user, I can't answer your immediate question, but I'd like to point out that you should never be activating every font you can (Windows or Mac). It slows down your system. You increase the risk font conflicts or corrupted fonts. And it creates obscenely long font menus.

Actuate the fonts you need to use with your font manager. That's what it's there for.

Neil

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3c060c51.0@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feeder1.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!138.195.8.3.MISMATCH!news.ecp.fr!news.stben.net!webcrossing

References: <3c060c51.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1042b6,f2420921184db625
X-Google-Attributes: gid1042b6,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Neil_Keller@adobeforums.com
Newsgroups: adobe.typography
Subject: Re: FontAgent Pro vs ATM Deluxe
Message-ID: <3c060c51.0@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:43:38 -0800
References: <3c060c51.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 12
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feeder1.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!138.195.8.3.MISMATCH!news.ecp.fr!news.stben.net!webcrossing

Reply to Parent Message