Re: FontAgent Pro vs ATM Deluxe

Article View: adobe.typography

Article #530

#530

From: Arnis_Gubins
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 04:34

4 lines
854 bytes

I've been using ATM Deluxe on XP Pro from day one and have no issues
with it. It works as expected. I keep my fonts organized by client
projects and active/de-activate as required. Nothing fancy, but it
does the job.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9smnq3d385er342n6ugjnursqf2kudnlcq@4ax.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!news.ecp.fr!news.stben.net!webcrossing

References: <3c060c51.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1042b6,f2420921184db625
X-Google-Attributes: gid1042b6,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Arnis_Gubins@adobeforums.com
Newsgroups: adobe.typography
Subject: Re: FontAgent Pro vs ATM Deluxe
Message-ID: <9smnq3d385er342n6ugjnursqf2kudnlcq@4ax.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 20:34:59 -0800
References: <3c060c51.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 4
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!news.ecp.fr!news.stben.net!webcrossing

Reply to Parent Message