Article View: adobe.typography
Article #592Re: "Universal" font
From: Thomas_Phinney
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:12
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:12
5 lines
1001 bytes
1001 bytes
I believe Michael is correct. Whichever forms they picked, they did pick one set. So like any other font currently available, Arial Unicode isn't good for more than one of [Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean]. Cheers, T
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<59b5c219.14@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.buerger.net!news4us.nl!webcrossingReferences:
<59b5c219.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1042b6,22a8efcbb509fafe X-Google-Attributes: gid1042b6,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Thomas_Phinney@adobeforums.com Newsgroups: adobe.typography Subject: Re: "Universal" font Message-ID: <59b5c219.14@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:12:32 -0700 References: <59b5c219.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.buerger.net!news4us.nl!webcrossing X-Original-Lines: 8 X-Original-Bytes: 751