Article View: adobe.typography
Article #594Re: "Universal" font
From: Michael_Mueller-Hillebrand
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:40
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:40
13 lines
1119 bytes
1119 bytes
Gaelle, do you have bold or italic text in your documents? Make a print of Polish or Cyrillic text with and without bold and/or italic formatting and compare them with standard Arial with bold/italic. You will see the quality difference. Also: If you still want to go that way, be warned that different printers handle electronic bold-ing and oblique-ing differently. Up to the point of ignoring it. In my opinion: A bad decision with many drawbacks. - Michael
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<59b5c219.16@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.buerger.net!news4us.nl!webcrossingReferences:
<59b5c219.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1042b6,22a8efcbb509fafe X-Google-Attributes: gid1042b6,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Michael_Mueller-Hillebrand@adobeforums.com Newsgroups: adobe.typography Subject: Re: "Universal" font Message-ID: <59b5c219.16@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:40:50 -0700 References: <59b5c219.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 16 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.buerger.net!news4us.nl!webcrossing