Re: FontAgent Pro vs ATM Deluxe

Article View: adobe.typography

Article #638

#638

From: Neil_Keller
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 20:11

3 lines
764 bytes

Unfortunately, the loss of ATM Deluxe/Mac has been a sore point for a lot of Mac users. Given our "druthers", we'd rather have ATM Deluxe back than use the alternatives.

Neil

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3c060c51.3@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!news.ecp.fr!news.stben.net!webcrossing

References: <3c060c51.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1042b6,f2420921184db625
X-Google-Attributes: gid1042b6,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Neil_Keller@adobeforums.com
Newsgroups: adobe.typography
Subject: Re: FontAgent Pro vs ATM Deluxe
Message-ID: <3c060c51.3@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:11:19 -0800
References: <3c060c51.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!news.ecp.fr!news.stben.net!webcrossing

Reply to Parent Message