Article View: adobe.web.print.workflow
Article #11Re: Scanning for the web
From: Dan_Arrington
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:00
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:00
9 lines
1423 bytes
1423 bytes
Thanks, Mike. I understand your point about ownership of the ad, and that's an issue I'll tackle separately. At any rate, I don't have access to the original file at this point. (That's how I got into the spot of having to scan to begin with.) Re-creating the ad would be an option if I could get hold of the background image they used, but I don't have that either. (Though I'm trying....) Now back to the topic: if I understand correctly, you're telling me I should reduce the resolution and that I can expect poor reproduction of the text. That's a bit of a bummer, as even at 300-600 dpi the text looks crummy. If I go the jpg/gif route, should I scan that at 72-96 dpi and then post it directly? Will I still run into the problem of poor text reproduction? Thanks again, D.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3bb4fedd.1@webx.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webxReferences:
<3bb4fedd.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b211,1fcf09bc39a392c1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b211,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Dan_Arrington@adobeforums.com Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx Newsgroups: adobe.web.print.workflow Subject: Re: Scanning for the web Message-ID: <3bb4fedd.1@webx.la2eafNXanI> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 03:00:33 -0700 References: <3bb4fedd.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 19 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit