Article View: ahn.tech.linux
Article #3034Re: RH installation on a seperate HD
From: Wilma Flintstone
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 1999 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 1999 00:00
52 lines
2787 bytes
2787 bytes
Actually this works quit well and is the preferred method if you want to install with another OS. When using the master/slave situation you should make RH the slave drive so that the MBR can initiate LILO and boot to the appropriate drive and OS. If you use another drive altogether it will not be seen as the "D" drive on your Win doze machine but only as a LILO boot function. You will only have access to the "C" drive when booting to win doze and only the drive or partition you have made for RH. LILO will work with Win95/98/NT. Your best bet is to have a seperate drive for RH and one for Win. As long as you have two drives there will not be a virus problem unless of course, you download one from the Internet. Good Luck to your son, may he do well with his projects. wilma On Wed, 1 Sep 1999 00:44:24 -0700, "walter szumilak" <szumilak@psphalifax.ns.ca> wrote: > >My son has taken a job up in Ottawa Ont. We initially played around with >Win 3.1 and an version 3.03 of RH and although it was a bit of an adventure >we finally managed to co-locate both operating systems on one hard drive. >LILO worked very well permitting the desired OS take control of the >hardware. Since then my son has devoted a separate computer to Linux RH 6.0. >Most of his programming applications / compilers are on his Win 95 based >machine which I will be sending up to hime this week. I intend to remove the >hard drive from his Linux system and install it in the WIN95 system as a D: >drive and reinstall RH 6.0. > > My questions are: > >1. Has anyone install RH 6.0 on a WIN 95 based system where WIN is located >on C: drive and Linux is installed on D: drive? > >2. Will Win 95 permit the installation of LILO so that either OS can boot? > >3. Are there any known problems that arise from such an installation ( such >as detection of entries in the MBR as a suspected virus contamination)? > > >I would appreciate any advise at all. Unfortunately the manual does not >include the set up for such a configuration. > > >Thank You in advance > > >Wally Szumilak > >szumilak@psphalifax.ns.ca >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<vVXTN054ARYrwMGI0VoZCfflCjSp@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<rsp5til1j7118@corp.supernews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11033e,8cbe8748660b45d6 X-Google-Attributes: gid11033e,public From: Wilma Flintstone <wilma@sna.com> Subject: Re: RH installation on a seperate HD Date: 1999/09/05 Message-ID: <vVXTN054ARYrwMGI0VoZCfflCjSp@4ax.com> X-Deja-AN: 521776319 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <rsp5til1j7118@corp.supernews.com> X-Posted-Path-Was: not-for-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-ELN-Date: 6 Sep 1999 17:59:57 GMT X-ELN-Insert-Date: Mon Sep 6 11:05:13 1999 Organization: Linux Lovers Lounge Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: wilma@sna.com Newsgroups: ahn.tech.linux