🚀 go-pugleaf

Doyon from the best I can see was doing much the same that the
Feds/US Military acted to take the lands away from the Indians,
so in the end, who is right?

Doyon is a Limited CORPORATION not a INDIANS COUNTRY Entity no
matter what they like to think. They have only that sovereignty
that they have been granted by the State of Alaska or by the
Federal Government and that is not Indian Country sovereignty.
Sovereignty at least how is it expressed/maintained is either by
not having anyone around to contest it, or by virtue of being
recognized by other sovereign bodies. To the best of my knowledge
Doyan and other native corporations have none of the above,
other maybe a non-voting representative to the UN (ICC and
other). But that still does not mean they have thee right to come
on a private individuals land and burn his property (see above
REF: FEDs/US Military).
Two wrongs do not make a right!

If the lands had been turned over to Doyan by the Feds/State and
the processes of Eminent Domain had been adhered to, and the said
gentleman had not left the land, then the Feds/State would move
in and remove him physically. Since Doyon is not a soveriegn body
it can not act as one, such as acting as police/etc. Even the
VPSO/VPO have to maintain STATE/FEDERAL LAW on native corporation
lands and if so delegated local laws (delegated from the
Feds/State).

Wonder why they call them Boroughs? Municipalities? Cause they
are chartered by the Feds/State as such (normally the State).

If the land is private property the private security can remove
the person, but only as CITIZENS not as police.

But as far as I have heard, the land was the man and not Doyon
LTD. Therefore the acts of Doyon are basically the same as any
KLAN cross burning/lynching.

EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW GOES BOTH WAYS!