Re: Haven't we had enough

Article View: ak.general

Article #2342

#2342

From: Rick Shank
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 1996 00:00

61 lines
3166 bytes

In article <327A4549.5407@aud.alcatel.com>,
Jeff  <bankjl@aud.alcatel.com> wrote:
>> WJC is without a doubt the sleaziest president we have ever had.  Of 
>course, #2
>> was GHWB. 
>
>I guess I'm confused as to what Bush did that made him so sleazy.  Tell 
>me, was he accused of adultry 

No, and he probably didn't commit adultry either.

>or using a public office for illegal 
>purposes?  

Yes.  Last time I heart, selling arms to the enemy (Iran) was called treason.
If you had done the same, you would have been executed for it.  Reagan and
Bush were reelected.

>Although he may have not been the best president ever, he 
>certainly wasn't the worst, 

That's a fact.

>and from all indications he is an upstanding, 
>moral US citizen.  

Bullshit.  He was president.  He can't be moral and upstanding by definition.

>So you're statement about him is completely unfounded. 

Pffffttttt!!!!

> But then, a lot of people's opinions concerning politics are not based 
>entirely on facts.
>

Hmmm!!!!  By the way, just where does *anyone* get the facts?  This question
is rhetorical.  If you think you have a valid answer other than nowhere or be
there, you are incorrect.

Rick

-- 
Disclaimer: Not only are these NOT necessarily the opinions of the great company
I work for - AMD, they may not even be the opinions of this author.  If you are 
smart, you will take this post as the scribblings of a madman and ignore it.
                      "I know NUSSING, absolutely nussing."  Sgt. Schultz

Technical Details

Message-ID: <55dh6d$gdg@amdint2.amd.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<54eqfm$332@news.internetmci.com> <3277f894.20669672@news.earthlink.net> <559i7g$r03@voyager.caro.NET> <327A4549.5407@aud.alcatel.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10ce2c,14f0b81757e31926
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ce2c,public
X-Google-Thread: f6e0e,e4506ffe12f9682a
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6e0e,public
X-Google-Thread: 115d61,e4506ffe12f9682a
X-Google-Attributes: gid115d61,public
X-Google-Thread: 100eae,e4506ffe12f9682a
X-Google-Attributes: gid100eae,public
X-Google-Thread: fab07,e4506ffe12f9682a
X-Google-Attributes: gidfab07,public
X-Google-Thread: fbf1a,14f0b81757e31926
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbf1a,public
X-Google-Thread: 105e42,e4506ffe12f9682a
X-Google-Attributes: gid105e42,public
X-Google-Thread: f7d58,e4506ffe12f9682a
X-Google-Attributes: gidf7d58,public
From: ricks@dvorak.amd.com (Rick Shank)
Subject: Re: Haven't we had enough
Date: 1996/11/01
Message-ID: <55dh6d$gdg@amdint2.amd.com>
X-Deja-AN: 193744228
references: <54eqfm$332@news.internetmci.com> <3277f894.20669672@news.earthlink.net> <559i7g$r03@voyager.caro.NET> <327A4549.5407@aud.alcatel.com>
organization: Advanced Micro Devices - Austin, Texas
reply-to: ricks@lagrange.amd.com
newsgroups: ak.general,alabama.general,alt.flame,alt.fan.karl-malden.nose,aol.neighborhood.az.phoenix.general,aol.neighborhood.il.chicago.general,aol.neighborhood.in.indianapolis.general,aol.neighborhood.ny.general,aol.neighborhood.ny.new-york.general,atl.general,austin.general,az.general,ba.general,ca.general,co.cos.general,co.fort-collins.general,co.general,compuserve.general,dc.general,delaware.general,dfw.general,fl.general,houston.general,il.general,kc.general,ky.general,la.general,lex.general,md.gene

Reply to Parent Message