Thread View: al.politics
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by cor
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:29
An ExxonMobil National Park near you?
Author: cor
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:29
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:29
76 lines
4640 bytes
4640 bytes
-------- Original Message -------- From: cherie@cecs.pdx.edu Subject: [EMMAS] National Parks Seeking Corporate Sponsorship http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/2495 National Parks Seeking Corporate Sponsorship by Brendan Coyne Oct 18 - Suffering under a budget crunch, America's national parks are turning to corporate sponsors to cover millions of dollars in expenses. The move to allow companies to brand portions of the nation's most pristine wilds is a marked change from the National Park Service's current passive acceptance of corporate largess. According to documents released by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) yesterday, the Park Service (NPS) is readying to accept outside solicitations to keep parks open and fully functioning. Specifically, the proposed rules allow sponsors to donate funds in exchange for displaying promotional materials both in parks and on NPS websites. On October 6, NPS Director Fran Mainella announced that his agency was accepting comments on proposed changes to service rules for accepting donations from individuals and groups. Among the proposed acceptable forms of donations are commemorative plaques, markers and naming portions of specific park facilities. The Park Service will also now allow employees to seek funds from companies currently doing business with the NPS, a direct about-face by the federal agency, PEER said. According to the new rules, employees can seek donations from corporations currently holding vending contracts with the Service. All sponsor companies would be allowed to display their logos prominently, the proposed NPS rules state. According to PEER, such "branding" is a "thinly disguised scheme to subject the public commons to corporate branding campaigns." The group charges that the Bush administration is seeking to undermine the parks system in order to privatize it. At a hearing earlier this month, the National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA) warned that the Park Service was operating with a structural deficit of more than $600 million. Overall, national parks are operating on two-thirds of their recommended funding, NPCA said. Park officials expect to raise usage fees next year to offset a portion of the shortfall, in addition to seeking corporate backing. NPCA is asking Congress to appropriate funds to close the gap. Other intrusive corporate fundraisers under consideration include cell-phone towers, low-altitude flights, and snowmobile and all-terrain-vehicle access, the Salt Lake Tribune reported last week. In addition, park managers would have limited authority to prevent development, the paper said. ============== ***NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.*** ============== ################################################################# " Social and economic well-being will become a reality only through the zeal, courage, the non-compromising determination of intelligent minorities, and not through the mass." Emma Goldman To SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE to the emmasdance list send email to <majordomo@cs.pdx.edu> with the message subscribe/unsubscribe emmasdance. [No subject is needed.] "If I can not dance, I want no part in your revolution." Emma Goldman #################################################################
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads