🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alc.test
Article #11934

Re: CMISE m-get-response: multiple or single?

#11934
From: Ulrich Raabe
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 09:20
52 lines
3033 bytes
In article <3aqio3$1ho@nlsw23.ats.nld.alcatel.nl>,
ouweland@nlsw23.ats.nld.alcatel.nl (Charles van den Ouweland) writes:

|>
|>My question is: when to use the single procedure and when the
|>multiple?
|>
|>Of course the multiple procedure must be used if there is more than
|>one
|>MO. But if there is exactly one MO, both procedures are suitable.
|>Is
|>there a rule which defines what to do in this case?  One could
|>imagine
|>a rule saying: "If there is exactly one MO selected by scoping and
|>filtering, the single procedure shall be used". Or there could be a
|>rule: "If scope=base object only, the single procedure shall be
|>used,
|>and otherwise the multiple procedure". But I haven't found such a
|>rule
|>yet.

I've used a database which used the single procedure and another one
which used the multiple procedure, when just one MOC was found. 
So, you have to look in the desciption of the CMISE user how
he/she/it
will handle the situation - or try it.

I can't say the following is generally true, but I assume that one 
policy for those situation is: if you ask for a single MOC then the 
single procecure is used. In case you don't know the number of
returned
MOCs when sending the m-get-request (e.g. when using filtering) the 
multiple procedure is used. The latter makes it easier for the
algorithm used for creating m-get-response.

Sorry for this weak answer, but these are my experiences.
 
-- 

							    ,   ,
Servus Uli						   ( ) ( )
							   | | | |
"Press any key to continue - or any other key to quit"	   | | | |
							   | |.| |
							   | / \ |
+----------------------------------------------------------|_|_|_|--+
| Ulrich Raabe    ,,,,,   Email : Ulrich.Raabe@zfe.siemens.de       |
| Siemens AG       . .    XNS   : ure:49/89/636/18:mch p siemens ag |
| ZFE T SN 2      @ | @   Phone : + 49 89 636 48 308                |
| D-81730 Munich   \_/    Fax   : + 49 89 636 48 000                |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3asd45$6ct@ztivax.zfe.siemens.de>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!EU.net!Germany.EU.net!Munich.Germany.EU.net!zfe.siemens.de!genf!raabe
References: <3aqio3$1ho@nlsw23.ats.nld.alcatel.nl>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 115d32,35fb71ceb0b58076
X-Google-Attributes: gid115d32,public
X-Google-Thread: 10fc9c,35fb71ceb0b58076
X-Google-Attributes: gid10fc9c,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f2ac,35fb71ceb0b58076
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f2ac,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-22 01:57:07 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!EU.net!Germany.EU.net!Munich.Germany.EU.net!zfe.siemens.de!genf!raabe
From: raabe@genf.zfe.siemens.de (Ulrich Raabe)
Newsgroups: alc.test,comp.dcom.net-management,comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Re: CMISE m-get-response: multiple or single?
Date: 22 Nov 1994 09:20:05 GMT
Organization: Siemens AG, Munich
Lines: 52
Sender: raabe@genf (Ulrich Raabe)
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3asd45$6ct@ztivax.zfe.siemens.de>
References: <3aqio3$1ho@nlsw23.ats.nld.alcatel.nl>
Reply-To: Ulrich.Raabe@zfe.siemens.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: genf.zfe.siemens.de
X-Newsreader: mxrn 6.18-20