🚀 go-pugleaf

What kind of animal is the UK Prime Minister now? He has a great 
responsibility for over one hundred thousand innocent lives in Iraq. The 
death of one innovent person would tear the conscience of any normal man 
apart. Does Blair have any concience whatsoever? Facts tend to show that he 
has not got one. This is a dangerous man for all UK citizens.

Now this thing tries to defend the infensible as detailed below. Blair has 
never been a socialist and New Labour may as well now be renamed New 
Conservatives. Blair is a high 33 degree ranking member of the Secret 
Society of Freemasons. Queen Elizabeth II is the Patron Head of the UK 
Secret Society of Freemasons. She is an integral part of what someone has 
called the massive Judicial Oath fraud. It is beleived that this man may now 
be dead. Queen Elizabeth's cousin, the Duke of Kent, is the Grand Master of 
all UK Freemasons. The list goes on. This is all a part of the real UK most 
people are unaware of. Freemasonry oils the wheels of the very corrupt parts 
of the UK Royalty led establishment. Most Freemasons it appears are not even 
aware of what they really are a part of.

Now that Blair thinks its reasonable that UK weathy people should be allowed 
to buy their way into positions of power and influence, then surely its time 
for him to become subject of a suitable but independent medical examination? 
Blair is known to be depriving the UK people of their rights under Article 
6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. This is no trivial matter but 
Blair is being allowed to get away with this as well with his part in the 
illegal war against Iraq. Its time to get rid of members of Secret Societies 
in power. Blair's bosom pal, G W Bush, is a member of the Secret Society of 
the Scull and Bones. It appears that people such as these, can only get into 
positions of power by getting a hand to do that from whatever Secret Society 
they are a part of.  Sign the Petition link below to help make a start for a 
better world and not one where wealth is more important than democracy. 
Under Blair, Britain is in real danger. We have seen some of the dangers 
caused by him since he came to power on a sea of deception.. There are 
clearly more dangers yet to come under Blair.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/479012713?ltl=1142175514

Public Interest.

Item below from the Scotsman.com

Cash for peerages acceptable says Blair
GERRI PEEV POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT
  a.. Blair set to defend cash for honours
  b.. Donations from 'Philanthropists' should be encouraged
  c.. Police still set to launch full investigation, however
Key quote "Membership of the Lords is for people who are competent to make 
laws, not rewarding party sponsors and donors. The present system has been 
severely discredited." - Simon Hughes, the Liberal Democrats' party 
president

Story in full
TONY Blair was last night planning to mount an extraordinary defence of the 
government's issuing of peerages to wealthy tycoons who bankroll its 
policies, arguing that such honours are legitimate.

The Prime Minister was preparing to claim that it is right for ministers to 
recognise "philanthropist" businessmen who give their time and money to 
running controversial city academy schools by handing them a seat in the 
House of Lords.

The government has been rocked by the so-called "cash for honours" scandal 
since Scotland Yard announced it was launching a full investigation into the 
allegations.

Last week, police arrested Des Smith, a former adviser to the government 
over city academies, who had allegedly told an undercover reporter that 
honours and peerages could effectively be bought in exchange for bankrolling 
the schools.

But separate sources close to the Labour Party and Mr Blair have confirmed 
that the Prime Minister is prepared to go on the offensive to protect 
"philanthropists".

One source close to No 10 said: "It is right that those who support public 
services are recognised for their contributions. It doesn't mean they will 
automatically receive this, as each one is assessed case by case."

The Prime Minister was prepared to put up a strong defence against whoever 
challenged him on this, the source said, a clear hint that Mr Blair could be 
preparing to make a statement to police.

A source told The Scotsman that people in the UK had to make sure that "we 
do not discourage philanthropists".

"If people have made money in the private sector and they want to 
contribute, then that is not something which should be seen as problematic. 
It should be welcomed."

Earlier, a Downing Street aide had said the government was "very positive 
about people who have given their money, expertise and time being 
recommended for seats in the House of Lords".

"We want these people to be in the House of Lords and take the Labour whip. 
It is something we are prepared to celebrate," the aide said.

The controversy was sparked after it emerged that two of Mr Blair's 
nominations for the House of Lords - Sir David Garrard and Barry Townsley - 
gave more than �1 million in sponsorship to academies.

The nominations of the businessmen, who had also lent money to the Labour 
Party, were blocked by the House of Lords Appointments Commission.

This weekend, Peter Vardy, one of England's most prominent backers of city 
academies, warned that the controversy could scare off future bankrollers, 
who each had to put up �2 million for the state schools.

"If the initiative is sunk because of this cash for honours, it'll be an 
enormous change to the generations of young people who need a much better 
education than they're getting at the moment," he said.

Bill Rammell, the education minister, yesterday rejected any suggestion that 
financial support for city academies automatically resulted in honours.

"If people do that, if they give that commitment, then they should be able 
to be considered for honours, but it certainly should not be a guarantee," 
he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

Simon Hughes, the Liberal Democrats' party president, said it was outrageous 
for the Prime Minister to attempt to legitimise cash for peerages.

"Membership of the Lords is for people who are competent to make laws, not 
rewarding party sponsors and donors. The present system has been severely 
discredited."

Related topics

  a.. Political Funding
  http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=347
  b.. Cronyism in politics
  http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=501
  c.. Tony Blair's leadership
  http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=926
This article: http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=584172006

Last updated: 18-Apr-06 10:05 BST

Delivery formats for "Scotsman.com News"