Thread View: alt.agnosticism
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by _News Server_
Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:17
%% Hey General Scammy you Blasphemous Bitch ! %%
Author: _News Server_
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:17
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:17
85 lines
4798 bytes
4798 bytes
Blasphemy law revival upsets the Dutch elite
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Brussels
(Filed: 18/11/2004)
A proposal to revive a blasphemy law to calm sectarian tensions in Holland
has outraged artists, writers and the political elite.
The plan follows the murder of film-maker Theo van Gogh by a Dutch-Moroccan
extremist in Amsterdam two weeks ago.
The killing was followed by bomb attacks on mosques and reprisal attacks on
churches.
In response, the Dutch justice minister, Piet Hein Donner, has proposed
enforcing a 1932 law banning "scornful blasphemy".
The minister told the Dutch parliament on Tuesday that the law was needed to
curb "hateful comments", whether oral or written, that were destabilising
the country.
"If the opinions have a potentially damaging effect on society, the
government must act," he said. "It is not about religion specifically, but
any harmful comments in general."
Mr Donner, a Christian-Democrat, said strict enforcement was needed to stop
"explosive material" setting off yet more violence.
His announcement horrified Holland's free-thinking intelligentsia, mostly
congregated in the university enclaves of Amsterdam, Delft, Utrecht and The
Hague.
A group of writers and artists published a letter in the Volkskrant
newspaper condemning the idea as an assault on free speech and asking
whether they would be hauled before an inquisition for poking fun at
religion.
The blasphemy law was introduced by Mr Donner's grandfather, Jan Donner,
Holland's Right-wing justice minister in the 1930s, to silence a communist
newspaper, which had suggested banning Christmas.
The law has not been invoked since 1968 when a Dutch novelist, Gerard
Kornells van het Reve, was prosecuted for depicting God as a randy donkey.
He was acquitted by Holland's top court on the grounds that his intent was
not "scornful".
Blasphemy, which carries a three-month prison sentence, covers insults
against God but is ambiguous about saints and religious figures.
It was unclear whether Theo van Gogh would have fallen foul of the law. An
inflammatory provocateur, he relished denigrating Islam, Judaism and
Christianity in equal measure as forms of barbarous superstition.
He called Muslims "pimps of the Prophet", while accusing Jews of milking the
Holocaust for sympathy, for which he faced a defamation suit.
It is also unclear whether Mr van Gogh would have been allowed to broadcast
his film Submission, which dealt with Islam's treatment of women and
apparently provoked his murder.
Rita Verdonk, the hard-line immigration minister, said invoking the
blasphemy law smacked of cultural surrender to Islamic extremists. It would
impose Muslim standards of acceptable free speech, she said, and asked why
misogynist and homophobic comments by Islamic clerics were not to be treated
in the same way.
Laetitia Griffith, an MP for the VVD liberals, said the justice minister was
exploiting Mr van Gogh's murder to impose his bible-belt values on the
country.
The Dutch parliament is expected to vote next Tuesday on a counter-proposal
by the Left-wing D-66 party to expunge the blasphemy law from the criminal
code.
"I don't see any way of winning" [in Vietnam]
-- President Lyndon Johnson privately to
Defense Secretary McNamara 1965
"America wins the wars that she undertakes.
Make no mistake about it!"
-- President Lyndon Johnson public speech
1965 re: Vietnam War
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads