🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <327EE475.66F1@mail.sdsu.edu>, Edmond says...

>jmcarth1@gtn.net wrote:

>> In article <alford-0411961905480001@an220.du.pipex.com>, alford@dial.pipex.com says...

>> >In article <01bbc94a$4ee7d640$6f8860ce@david-lawler>, "dglmal@telis.com"
>> ><dglmal@telis.org> wrote:

>> >> If you look at our solar system we have a missing planet.  This missing
>> >> planet has left plenty of evidence if we look between the orbits of Mars &
>> >> Jupiter there should be a planet. However, what we find is called the
>> >> Asteroid Belt.
>> >> My theory is that the Asteroid belt several millions (160 or so) ago was
>> >> really a planet that for some reason it exploded 

>The civilization on it at the time exploded it yes.

>>killing off the Earth's
>> >> dinosaurs, destroyed all life on mars by blowing away most of Mar's
>> >> atmosphere.
>> >> This theory also explains why the earth has such a over size satellite

>Well this part I find hard to agree with because to "capture" this size 
>satellite (our moon) and keep it so stable is rather unlikely. More 
>likely that they evolved together. Accretion as opposed to capturing.

>> and
>> >> why the super continent Pangea broke into seven smaller continents that are
>> >> now drifting around the globe.

>Well my theory on this is because the Earth and Moon separated 

Odd that this does not show up in tidal rhyrhmite studies (counting 
the variation of varves in tidal sedimentary sequences) which have 
yielded data as far back as  900 million years (Ma). Although these 
studies show that the moon is retreating it has been doing so for a 
very long time at a very slow rate.

>and when 
>they did, it left pangea that eventually balanced itself out naturally 
>and distributed across the planet.

Interesting.... what about Rodinia?

Rodinia:  assembled Precambrian (ca. 1100 Ma) and broke up during 
          late Precambrian (ca. 600 Ma.).

Did the moon separate from the Earth at this time as well or did 
the event occur at some distant time before any land existed?

You do realize that plate tectonics could not occur for most 
of the  Earth history (<1500 Ma) since the crust was not thick 
enough and too hot. If you have some evidence of modern
plate tectonics in Archean rock please tell me because I and 
a lot of others would like to know.

>> >> Check the mass of the belt and moon, I think you will find there is a
>> >> enough dirt floating around out there to equal a good size terrestrial
>> >> planet.

>Your theory by the way IS NOT new.
>Possible, but not probable in my mind.

>> >> David Lawler
>> >> dglmal@telis.org

>> >Go and read Zecharia Sitchin's Earth Chronicles, with his theory of Planet
>> >X, which collided with Tiamat, creating the Asteroid Blet. Earth is the
>> >remaining half of Tiamat. See also chapter 7 of my recently published book
>> >"Gods of the New Millennium" which updates and refines Sitchin's arguments
>> >for Planet X. 

>> I suggest actually reading some geology and planetary physics textbooks.
>> Both of you need to do this as soon as possible. It should help you alot.

>I don't know about these fellows but I have and this is why I abandoned 
>them, because conventional theories are more silly than these.

That�s a lot of stuff that is silly...   do you have some good examples 
of this geological silliness.

Archae Solenhofen (jmcarth1@gtn.net)

>> Archae Solenhofen (jmcarth1@gtn.net) 
>> >Alan Alford
>> >Author "Gods of the New Millennium" http://www.eridu.co.uk----
>"It is the theory that determines what we can observe." Albert Einstein
>-- 
>Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.                       
>� 1996 Astrological Consulting/Altair Publications
>http://home.aol.com/ewollmann
>PO Box 221000 San Diego, CA. 92192-1000
>(619)453-2342  e-mail wollmann@mail.sdsu.edu