Article View: alt.alien.research
Article #86Re: An early British vision
From: Karl And Amy Rivers
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:00
428 lines
18556 bytes
18556 bytes
I'm a brit! Stafford wrote in message <7o7350$2rb0$1@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com>... > ><patanie@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:7o6uu3$i5p$1@nnrp1.deja.com... >> An Early >> British >> Naval >> Sighting. >> >> � By Gordon >> Creighton. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> At the time when FSR was being launched, in the >> spring of 1955, I was working - after a diplomatic >> career on four continents - in an Intelligence >> post somewhere in the governmental and >> administrative heart of London known as Whitehall. >> The name of the organisation where I was employed >> and the nature of my duties there are not matters >> that need to be chronicled here, and it will >> perhaps suffice if I say that, being in central >> London, I was well placed to make social contacts >> with people of various services, including >> officers of the CIA and of the American Air Force >> Intelligence. >> >> Having once seen something extraordinary in the >> sky (in the far west of China, no less than >> fourteen years before FSR began) my mind was >> already much taken up with the problems of the >> "flying saucers." And, among these officers and >> officials whom I was meeting outside of as well as >> inside office hours I found that there were some >> who were evidently pretty knowledgeable and who >> took more than just a superficial or passing >> interest in the "saucers" and were even very >> willing to discuss them seriously, although I >> noticed that, naturally enough, they seemed far >> more keen on 'pumping' other folk than on >> releasing much information on the subject >> themselves. In other words, they were already >> "cagey". (I emphasise again that these officials >> were invariably encountered on purely social >> occasions, for my own work was in no way connected >> with them, secret though it was, and none of them >> were ever met in the course of my duties.) >> >> It must of course be borne in mind that those were >> still very early days in the UFO business. The >> meetings of the famous"Robertson Panel" of >> scientists in the USA only took place in 1953. >> Things were fluid still, "the lid was by no means >> fully screwed down yet", and lots of stories and >> reports were getting into the newspapers which >> would assuredly never get into them now, and >> people in uniform were correspondingly more >> relaxed still and not yet quite as much on their >> guard as they would be in later years. >> >> In the summer of 1958, on a social occasion, while >> taking my vacation in a country not far from >> Britain,, I met another American officer - a >> captain in the U.S. Air Force Intelligence, with >> whom I had a very interesting chat for an hour or >> so on UFOs. He told me that he had had a personal >> encounter with a "foo fighter" when about to land >> his plane on an airfield near Tokyo in 1946, very >> shortly after the defeat of Japan. He told me >> that, at a certain moment, the "foo fighter" >> exploded right in front of his aircraft. He said >> the whole area beneath and round about was combed >> exhaustively by American troops and Japanese >> police, but not a scrap of the enigmatic intruder >> was ever found. In the famous Brazilian case at >> Ubatuba, (1) in September 1957, on the other hand, >> it will be recalled that the "foo fighter" fell >> right on the shore-line, between sea and land, and >> a good proportion of it was recovered and, as we >> were subsequently informed by APRO, was being >> analysed in a Brazilian laboratory. (Further >> reports were promised, but I never saw any, and >> this did not surprise me!) We gathered however >> that the main constituent of the object was the >> easily combustible element magnesium. >> >> I then told the American Air Force Intelligence >> officer about the strange sight that I (along with >> two other Europeans) had seen in the sky over a >> city in the remote interior of China at about noon >> one day in the summer of 1941, (2) and he listened >> with evident interest and asked many questions, >> but refused to speculate. I was left with the >> impression that he already "knew a lot". >> >> >> >> >> ADMIRAL LORD LOUIS MOUNTBATTEN. >> >> One of the earliest "big names" that we heard >> mentioned in connection with the "flying saucers" >> was that of Admiral Lord Louis Mountbatten. He too >> - so it was said - "knew a lot about flying >> saucers", because the British Navy possessed >> photographs of them in flight over the sea, and >> also sometimes at rest on the surface of the >> water. >> >> My own (unpublicised) association with FSR had >> started with the very establishment of the journal >> in 1955. I had filled in a subscription form and >> sent off my cheque, and in due course, as a >> subscriber, I began to receive from their first >> secretary Brinsley le Poer Trench (later Lord >> Clancarty) my FSRs, from No. 1 onwards. My first >> contributed item appeared in issue No.2 (Vol.1 >> No.2) but it was to be a good many years before my >> name was given in the journal - not, in fact, >> until I had ceased to be a civil servant. >> >> As for Lord Mountbatten's great personal interest >> in our subject - we knew with certainty that this >> was true, for he had asked to receive FSR, and a >> copy of every issue was accordingly sent to him >> right from the beginning. (Nor was he the only >> person in those very highest levels among our >> national leaders who had expressed such an >> interest, and who consequently also received every >> issue of FSR right from the commencement.) >> >> >> >> >> A STRANGE STORY. >> >> Adistant relative of mine (now dead) had served >> in the Royal Navy in World War II. Not long ago, >> just before his death, he told me a strange story >> which I think should now be placed on record, as >> it agrees so closely with some of those tales and >> rumours that were heard in Whitehall during the >> 1950s. He said, simply, that he knew a colleague, >> another British naval officer, who had worked in >> the early post-war years in the main building of >> the Admiralty - which, as I should perhaps explain >> for the benefit of foreign and overseas readers - >> was in those days the administrative headquarters >> for the Royal Navy and is in Whitehall. This >> officer told my relative that, on a certain >> occasion, in the Admiralty, he happened to visit >> the room of a very senior officer in the Royal >> Navy, and there, right on the great man's desk, he >> saw what he ought not to have seen - files on the >> subject of UFOs, and photographs of strange >> disc-shaped objects on the surface of the sea. >> >> >> >> >> THE ALLEGED LANDING ON THE MOUNTBATTEN >> ESTATE. >> >> After the murder of Lord Mountbatten by the IRA >> terrorists in 1979, FSR published an article by >> Desmond Leslie, (3) giving the details of an >> extraordinary affair regarding which we had >> already heard vague rumours over a good many years >> past. A UFO, or UFOs, it seems, had landed briefly >> in the grounds of the Mountbatten estate, at >> Broadlands, in Hampshire, Southern England, one >> snowy day during the 1950s, and an occupant of the >> craft had spoken to an Army NCO, Sergeant Briggs, >> a member of the Admiral's outdoor staff. According >> to Desmond Leslie, when Lord Mountbatten heard of >> the encounter, he at once sent for Sergeant Briggs >> and got him to make a full statement, of which >> seven copies were prepared. Briggs signed all >> seven copies, and was permitted to keep one, while >> Lord Mountbatten placed the other six copies in a >> drawer of his desk. >> >> >> >> >> CONFIRMATION BY CHARLES GIBBS-SMITH. >> >> When the Directors of FSR held their next board >> meeting, they were able to hear direct >> confirmation of this affair. For our colleague and >> fellow director Charles Gibbs-Smith reported that >> he had traced Sergeant Briggs and discussed the >> matter with him, and had seen his signed copy of >> the Report which Lord Mountbatten had drawn up. >> Several of us urged Charles Gibbs-Smith to put >> this important piece of corroborative evidence >> down in writing at once, so that it might go on >> record in our journal, and it is a matter for very >> great regret that our much-loved colleague, >> already a sick man, was apparently unable to >> attend to this before he died. This brief note >> must serve therefore for the record. >> >> >> >> >> EVIDENCE OF THE ROYAL NAVY'S INTEREST IN >> UFOs. >> >> Traditionally the Royal Navy has been known as >> the "Silent Service." Although we have all heard >> so much evidence to indicate the great interest >> taken by all Air Forces, and for many years past, >> in anything of a 'ufological' nature, only rarely >> have we heard of Navies taking an interest in such >> matters. Although a cursory glance through the >> history of our subject will show that at various >> times there have been reports of investigations by >> the naval authorities in the USA, Canada, Brazil, >> Argentina, and Chile, to name just a few, never, >> it seems, has there been mention of the British >> Navy. >> >> >> >> >> THE ARTICLE IN URANUS >> >> Recently, when leafing through the pages of >> Uranus (the early mimeographed UFO magazine, long >> since defunct, which was edited in the mid-1950s >> first by Eric Biddle and later by David Wightman) >> (4), I came across the interesting little story >> which I reproduce below. As will be noted, it is >> said to have come from a German press source but >> most unfortunately, though the name of the German >> newspaper is given, there is no reference to the >> date of either the paper or the alleged report. >> However, many readers may feel inclined to think, >> as I do, that the story sounds genuine. We must >> bear in mind that those were still the very early >> years of the UFO Phenomenon. The official clamps >> of secrecy only began to be effective around >> 1956-57, and in the seven years that had elapsed >> since Kenneth Arnold's famous sighting in July >> 1947 many extraordinary reports had got out that >> certainly would not stand the slightest chance of >> doing so today. >> >> I have no idea what the circulation of Uranus was, >> but it was certainly very small. It was a simple >> little mimeographed magazine on very poor paper, >> and it is likely that few copies will have >> survived. If we do not give this report wider >> circulation by reprinting it now, it will probably >> be lost and forgotten altogether. If we print it >> now, there is always the possibility that one of >> our German readers may be able to trace the >> original item in the Speyerer Tagespost, and if we >> take it from there we may be able to find out more >> about the story and learn from where they got it. >> >> Who knows? The possibility is not excluded that >> this story in a German newspaper concerns the very >> same UFO sighting and the same photographs about >> which the British naval officer from the Admiralty >> spoke to a member of my family a quarter of a >> century ago. >> >> >> >> >> A BRITISH NAVAL SIGHTING COMES TO LIGHT. >> >> (This report first appeared in the >> Speyerer Tagespost.) >> >> Three British submarines returned to Plymouth >> after manoeuvres held off the Bristol Channel. The >> Commander, Captain Chelwan. (5) reported to his >> Admiral that he had seen "Flying Saucers" floating >> on the sea approximately eleven nautical miles >> south of Lundy Island. He was able to take two >> photographs showing the objects. >> >> The research organisation on UFOs, formed about a >> year ago in London and attached to the Admiralty, >> confiscated the film at the Admiral's request, and >> decided that the photos would be studied, >> evaluated, and released for publication (6) at a >> later date. In the meantime Captain Chelwan was >> ordered to treat his encounter with the UFOs as a >> military secret and to instruct his officers and >> men accordingly. >> >> Before the order was imposed, however, a newspaper >> man obtained a five-minute interview with Captain >> Chelwan, and here is the Captain's story:- >> >> "We surfaced near Lundy Island, and, on opening >> the hatch, my Engineer and I noticed, about a mile >> to the S.W., two silvery discs floating on the >> sea. As the sun was shining on the ripples, I >> thought at first that it was a light reflection, >> but presently we both heard a buzzing sound. We >> quickly grabbed our binoculars and examined the >> objects. They were shaped like a disc slightly >> elevated in the middle, and had no windows, >> portholes, or other apertures. The elevated middle >> portion was stationary, but the flat outside >> portion, surrounding the middle part like a >> collar, rotated slowly on the water. >> >> "We thought the objects measured approximately 100 >> ft. across, the middle portion appearing to be not >> bigger than one tenth of the whole disc. The outer >> portion surrounding the centre piece appeared not >> to be attached to it, as there was a gap between >> them measuring abut two feet. >> >> "I must say we were very much surprised at the >> sight of those objects, and officers and men >> crowded (7) the deck staring as if they were >> hypnotised. As the whole "show" took only 80 >> seconds, it was impossible to form a sober >> judgement. Their origin seems to be a puzzle; >> technically they seemed far above anything we >> knew. We all though immediately that they were >> Flying Saucers. I intended to give an order to go >> at them full ahead and, if possible, get alongside >> them, but the buzzing sound became higher and more >> urgent, until the pitch was so high that it could >> not be heard any longer. The two discs mounted >> horizontally, turned sideways at about 300 ft, and >> disappeared in twenty seconds at a speed which I >> estimate to be at about 2,000 mph. At the same >> time a reddish glow surrounded the objects. (8) >> The Admiralty declared that the sighting was to be >> treated seriously and the evaluation of it would >> take some time." >> >> >> >> >> NOTES AND REFERENCES >> >> 1. See FSR, Vol. 6, No.4 (July/August 1960), page 21. >> >> 2. A brief account of this sighting has been given by Robert >> Chapman, Science Correspondent of the London Sunday Express, in his >> book Unidentified Flying Objects (pub. Arthur Barker, London, 1969) >> and later as a Mayflower paperback under the title UFO: Flying >> Saucers over Britain? (also 1969). >> >> 3. See Desmond Leslie: Did Flying Saucers Land at >> >> Broadlands?: Alleged Encounters on the Estate of Earl Mountbatten >> of Burma. In FSR Vol 26, No. 5 (January 1981). >> >> 4. See URANUS, Vol.3 No.3 (December 1956). Editor David Wightman. A >> mimeographed twenty-page bulletin issued six times yearly by >> Markham House Press Ltd., 31 King's Road, London SE3. >> >> 5. This name Chelwan should be an important clue. I asked the >> department of the Ministry of Defence who deal with these matters >> whether they could assist me by tracing an officer of this name, >> and I received an extraordinarily prompt reply that they had no >> record of any officer of such a name having served in the Royal >> Navy. It is very much to be hoped that one of our readers who has >> more leisure than we at FSR do (our number is very small), and who >> has access to old issues of the Navy List, might be able to effect >> a more convincing search for us, and tell us whether they have any >> success. >> >> 6....."released for publication...."OH YEAH We seem to have heard >> of such assurances on plenty of other occasions! >> >> 7. Remember that this UFO report dates from the early or mid-1950s, >> that is to say, from a time when very little had yet been published >> about the details of UFO appearance or UFO behaviour. Read this >> alleged naval officer's account carefully, and note how numerous >> are the features that today strike us as familiar, because we have >> seen them in so many other reports. It it be claimed that someone >> in Britain or Germany faked this story, then one can only say that >> he must have already been remarkably well informed on various >> aspects that can have been known only to a very few folk indeed at >> so early a date. >> >> 8. How often since then have we seen mention of this change of >> colour towards red as UFOs accelerate! >> >> >> �Flying Saucer Review Library of Congress >> copyright FSR Publications, Ltd. 1981. >> Contributions appearing in this magazine do not >> necessarily reflect its policy and are published >> without prejudice. >> >> >> Gordon Creighton (Editor FSR) > >Very interesting thnks > >maybe some brits on acadia can tell you wht they think any brits here? : ) >-- >Peace, > >David. >I updated my home page ! Yea !!! >Albert Einstein: "Only two things are infinite, the universe and >human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." >http://members.delphi.com/bosco6/index.html >Remove xxx to reply via email >> >> >> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ >> Share what you know. Learn what you don't. > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7o7gih$bti$2@nclient13-gui.server.virgin.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7o6uu3$i5p$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7o7350$2rb0$1@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: f98ed,34239162ce2ec7f4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf98ed,public X-Google-Thread: 102172,3630ff1f5713379a X-Google-Attributes: gid102172,public From: "Karl And Amy Rivers" <karl_and_amy.rivers@virgin.net> Subject: Re: An early British vision Date: 1999/08/03 Message-ID: <7o7gih$bti$2@nclient13-gui.server.virgin.net> X-Deja-AN: 508485246 References: <7o6uu3$i5p$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7o7350$2rb0$1@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@virgin.net X-Trace: nclient13-gui.server.virgin.net 933709201 12210 194.168.65.138 (3 Aug 1999 19:40:01 GMT) Organization: Virgin Net Usenet Service NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Aug 1999 19:40:01 GMT Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,acadia.chat