🚀 go-pugleaf

Real Friendly Neibourhood Vote Ranger wrote:
> "ah" <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:453ad361$0$15892$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>> Real Friendit Naybourhood Wote Monger wrote:
>>> "honestjohn" <honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>>> news:d_GdnXOtTcU-ranYnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
>>>>
>>>> "ah" <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:45342108$0$15888$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>>>>> Free Speech wrote:
>>>>> > "ah" <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> > news:4531d1ba$0$15908$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>>>>> >> http://www.infowars.com/ wrote:
>>>>> >>> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:59:18 -0500, "honestjohn"
>>>>> >>> <honestjohn@centurytel.net>
>>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>"http://www.infowars.com/" <truth@r.us> wrote in message
>>>>> >>>>news:8p5rg25son1qrqoqbmfje2spdiro2fc16k@4ax.com...
>>>>> >>>>> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:40:17 -0500, "honestjohn"
>>>>> >>>><honestjohn@centurytel.net>
>>>>> >>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> >
>>>>> >>>>> >"Art Deco" <erfc@netcabal.com> wrote in message
>>>>> >>>>> >news:170920060905418868%erfc@netcabal.com...
>>>>> >>>>> >> Double-A <double-aa@hush.ai> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >http://www.infowars.com/ wrote:
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:41:53 -0400, ah
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> <splifingate@gmail.com>
>>>>> >>>>wrote:
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>Holly wrote:
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> >http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/11277554/modern_times
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>Hi Alexa!
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Hi Alexa!
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>Hi Alexa!
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> Hi Alexa!
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>Hi Alexa!
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> Hi Alexa!
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Hi Alexa!
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>fiat money
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>Taking recipes for roasted gold bullion.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Everyone is a terrorist suspect in the USA now. :))))
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >The Meta Game:  US Response to losing control to
>>>> technological
>>>>> >>>>> >advancement
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >By Ryan Singel| Also by this reporter
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >15:30 PM Sep, 13, 2006
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >A bill radically redefining and expanding the government's
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >ability
>>>>> >>>>to
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >eavesdrop and search the houses of U.S. citizens without
>>>> court
>>>>> >>>>> >approval
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >passed a key Senate committee Wednesday, and may be voted 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >on
>>>> by
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >the
>>>>> >>>>> >full
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Senate as early as next week.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >By a 10-8 vote, the Senate Judiciary Committee approved
>>>> SB2453,
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >the
>>>>> >>>>> >National
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Security Surveillance Act (.pdf), which was co-written by
>>>>> >>>>committee's
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >chairman Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pennsylvania) in concert 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >with
>>>> the
>>>>> >>>>White
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >House.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >The committee also passed two other surveillance measures,
>>>>> >>>>including
>>>>> >>>>> >one
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >from Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California), one of the few
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >senators
>>>>> >>>>to
>>>>> >>>>> >be
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >briefed on the National Security Agency program. 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Feinstein's
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >bill,
>>>>> >>>>> >which
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Specter co-sponsored before submitting another bill, 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >rebuffs
>>>> the
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >administration's legal arguments and all but declares the
>>>>> >>>>warrantless
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >wiretapping illegal.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >In contrast, Specter's bill concedes the government's 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >right
>>>> to
>>>>> >>>>wiretap
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Americans without warrants, and allows the U.S. Attorney
>>>> General
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >to
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >authorize, on his own, dragnet surveillance of Americans 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >so
>>>> long
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >as
>>>>> >>>>> >the
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >stated purpose of the surveillance is to monitor suspected
>>>>> >>>>terrorists
>>>>> >>>>> >or
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >spies.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Lisa Graves, senior legislative counsel for the American
>>>> Civil
>>>>> >>>>> >Liberties
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Union, called the bill "stunning."
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >"The administration has taken their illegal conduct in
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >wiretapping
>>>>> >>>>> >Americans
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >without court orders, in violation of the Foreign
>>>> Intelligence
>>>>> >>>>> >Surveillance
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Act and the Constitution, and used it as springboard to 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >not
>>>> only
>>>>> >>>>get
>>>>> >>>>> >FISA
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >changed to allow the Terrorist Surveillance Program, but 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >to
>>>>> >>>>actually,
>>>>> >>>>> >going
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >forward, not give protections to Americans' privacy 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >rights,"
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Graves
>>>>> >>>>> >said.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Jim Dempsey, the policy director for the more moderate
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Center
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >for
>>>>> >>>>> >Democracy
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >and Technology, described the bill's passage out of
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >committee
>>>> as
>>>>> >>>>> >"light
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >years or miles beyond the Patriot Act."
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >"What started out as Sen. Specter wanting to rein in the
>>>>> >>>>president's
>>>>> >>>>> >program
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >has turned on its head and is now not just a legislative
>>>>> >>>>ratification
>>>>> >>>>> >of the
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >program, but an expansion of warrantless wiretapping of
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Americans,"
>>>>> >>>>> >Dempsey
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >said. "It would allow the NSA to turn its vacuum cleaners 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >on
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >even
>>>>> >>>>> >domestic
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >phone calls and e-mails of citizens.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >"They do all of this in Alice in Wonderland fashion by
>>>> defining
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >all
>>>>> >>>>> >kinds of
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >categories of surveillance to be not surveillance," said
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Dempsey.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Specter, who called NSA's warrantless surveillance a
>>>> "festering
>>>>> >>>>sore
>>>>> >>>>> >on our
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >body politic," champions his bill, since it allows, but 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >does
>>>> nor
>>>>> >>>>> >require,
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >the administration to submit the whole surveillance 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >program
>>>> to
>>>>> >>>>review
>>>>> >>>>> >by a
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >secretive court. Specter says President Bush promised to
>>>> submit
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >the
>>>>> >>>>> >NSA
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >program to the court, if the bill passes.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >The bill also strikes from U.S. law a requirement that all
>>>>> >>>>> >surveillance of
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >suspected spies and terrorists be done in accordance with
>>>> FISA.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >But
>>>>> >>>>an
>>>>> >>>>> >aide
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >for Specter disputes that this radically changes FISA or 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >the
>>>>> >>>>balance
>>>>> >>>>> >of
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >powers: Specter considers this to be an update to FISA 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >that
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >moves
>>>>> >>>>the
>>>>> >>>>> >law
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >toward where technology is now, according to the aide, who
>>>> spoke
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >on
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >background.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Bush has acknowledged the NSA program monitors Americans'
>>>>> >>>>> >international
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >phone calls and e-mails without court authorization, but
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >says
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >the
>>>>> >>>>> >program
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >only targets communications where one side or the other 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >has
>>>>> >>>>suspected
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >terrorist connections.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Feinstein says her briefings lead her to believe the 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >current
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >system
>>>>> >>>>> >needs
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >only minor changes, such as increasing the number of 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >judges
>>>> that
>>>>> >>>>issue
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >warrants.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >"I have been briefed on the terrorist-surveillance 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >program,
>>>> and
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >I
>>>>> >>>>have
>>>>> >>>>> >come
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >to believe that this surveillance can be done, without
>>>> sacrifice
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >to
>>>>> >>>>> >our
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >national security, through court-issued individualized
>>>> warrants
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >for
>>>>> >>>>> >content
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >collection on U.S. persons under the FISA process,"
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Feinstein
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >said
>>>>> >>>>> >Wednesday
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >in a press release.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >That program has recently been declared unconstitutional 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >by
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >a
>>>>> >>>>federal
>>>>> >>>>> >judge
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >in Detroit, and is being challenged by more than 20 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >lawsuits
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >across
>>>>> >>>>> >the
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >country.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >The bill:
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Redefines surveillance so that only programs that catch 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >the
>>>>> >>>>substance
>>>>> >>>>> >of a
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >communication need oversight. Any government surveillance
>>>> that
>>>>> >>>>> >captures,
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >analyzes and stores patterns of communications such as 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >phone
>>>>> >>>>records,
>>>>> >>>>> >or
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >e-mail and website addresses, is no longer considered
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >surveillance.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Expands the section of law that allows the attorney 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >general
>>>> to
>>>>> >>>>> >authorize
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >spying on foreign embassies, so long as there's no
>>>> "substantial
>>>>> >>>>> >likelihood"
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >that an American's communication would be captured.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Repeals the provision of federal law that allows the
>>>> government
>>>>> >>>>> >unfettered
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >wiretapping and physical searches without warrants or
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >notification
>>>>> >>>>for
>>>>> >>>>> >15
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >days after a declaration of war. The lack of any
>>>> congressional
>>>>> >>>>> >restraint on
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >the president's wartime powers arguably puts the president
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >at
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >the
>>>>> >>>>> >height,
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >rather than the ebb, of his powers in any time of war, 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >even
>>>> an
>>>>> >>>>> >undeclared
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >one.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Repeals the provision of federal law that limits the
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >government's
>>>>> >>>>> >wartime
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >powers to conduct warrantless wiretapping and physical
>>>> searches
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >to
>>>>> >>>>a
>>>>> >>>>> >period
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >of 15 days after a declaration of war.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Repeals the provision of federal law that puts a time 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >limit
>>>> on
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >the
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >government's wartime powers to conduct warrantless
>>>> wiretapping
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >and
>>>>> >>>>> >physical
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >searches against Americans. Under current law, the 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >president
>>>> has
>>>>> >>>>that
>>>>> >>>>> >power
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >for only 15 days following a declaration of war.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Allows the attorney general, or anyone he or she 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >designates,
>>>> to
>>>>> >>>>> >authorize
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >widespread domestic spying, such as monitoring all
>>>>> >>>>instant-messaging
>>>>> >>>>> >systems
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >in the country, so long as the government promises to 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >delete
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >anythi
>>>>> >>>>ng
>>>>> >>>>> >not
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >terrorism-related.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Moves all court challenges to the NSA surveillance program
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >to
>>>> a
>>>>> >>>>> >secretive
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >court in Washington, D.C., comprised of judges appointed 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >by
>>>> the
>>>>> >>>>Chief
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Justice of the Supreme Court. Only government lawyers 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >would
>>>> be
>>>>> >>>>allowed
>>>>> >>>>> >in
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >the courtroom.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Allows the government to get warrants for surveillance
>>>> programs
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >as
>>>>> >>>>a
>>>>> >>>>> >whole,
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >instead of having to describe to a judge the particular
>>>> persons
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >to
>>>>> >>>>be
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >monitored and the methods to be used.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >A markup of the corresponding House bill, sponsored by 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Rep.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Heather
>>>>> >>>>> >Wilson
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >(R-New Mexico) was scheduled for Wednesday, but was
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >canceled.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Specter has moved to have his bill voted upon next week by
>>>> voice
>>>>> >>>>vote,
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >called a unanimous consent motion, according to the ACLU's
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >Graves.
>>>>> >>>>> >Such a
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >procedure would leave no record of who voted for or 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >against
>>>> the
>>>>> >>>>bill.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >?
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >http://www.wired.com/news/technology/1%2C71778-0.html
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> Humm, lessee....
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> Top ten Reasons Why Any Idiot Would Volunteer To Live In A
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> Fascist
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> Dictatorship:
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> 10.  1.2 children allowed
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> 9.  Minimum wage is $5.25 per hour,  just enough to buy a
>>>> gallon
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> of
>>>>> >>>>gas
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> after taxes.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> 8.  Sending your children to be murdered in wars for oil in
>>>> the
>>>>> >>>>middle
>>>>> >>>>> >east
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> 7.  Spending 250k for a college education, only to find
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> you're
>>>> on
>>>>> >>>>the
>>>>> >>>>> >hit
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> list as an intellectual who is smarter than the entire US
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> government
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> 6.  Spending 450K for an apartment owned by a European bank
>>>> who
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> is
>>>>> >>>>> >backing
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> your hard earned money with hegemony gained from financing
>>>> your
>>>>> >>>>house
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> 5.  Everyone has a microwave and financed car
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> 4.  You get to pay 3/5 of your annual salary funding the US
>>>>> >>>>treasury,
>>>>> >>>>> >which
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> is bankrupt
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> 3.  Democracy means they want you to prop up the entire
>>>> economy
>>>>> >>>>buying
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> trinkets made in China
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> 2.  Peace is a treasonable offense
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> <drum roll, maestro!>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> 1.  If you don't go along with the above plan for the New
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> American
>>>>> >>>>> >Century
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> of Glory and Flag Waving, you get to spend all of eternity 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> in
>>>> one
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> of
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> Dickie's Concentration Camps, with 3 hots and a cot, like 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> the
>>>>> >>>>Katrina
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> victims.  Though it's looking more like they just gave them 
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> a
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> tent
>>>>> >>>>next
>>>>> >>>>> >to
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> The Local Exxon Station.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> And....
>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> >> 0.  Queen Beatrix and Queen Elizabeth are out of oil.
>>>>> >>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >Did you realize you are smamming to 10 different goups?
>>>>> >>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >You should get WebTV.  That will clip them right off!
>>>>> >>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>>>> >> >Double-A
>>>>> >>>>> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >> Hi, saucerhead!
>>>>> >>>>> >>
>>>>> >>>>> >Hi, Most mentally retarded Alpine Nazi Goat Humper!
>>>>> >>>>> >
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> To participate or to comment, contact Carl Osterwald, National
>>>>> >>>>> Renewable
>>>>> >>>>> Energy Lab, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401-3393 (303/384-6764;
>>>> fax:
>>>>> >>>>> 303/384-6790).
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> Email:
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> carl_osterwald@nrel.gov
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> http://www.astm.org/SNEWS/FEBRUARY_2000/solar.html
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>YES...YES...YES...
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Don't you feel, well, encouraged knowing your alternative energy
>>>>> >>> needs
>>>>> >>> are
>>>>> >>> being met by a front operation for the CIA which psyops the 
>>>>> >>> internet
>>>>> >>> instead
>>>>> >>> of actually planning for the loss of oil?
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> http://www.cheniere.org/sales/buy-ob.htm
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Especially considering you've been duped by people vastly more
>>>>> >>> knowledgeable
>>>>> >>> than YOU.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Really, kiddies.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Hello, Alexa.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Shim Skirtvan is a grandchild of Rothchild. And you will die
>>>>> > eventually.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I do, at least I will have the comfort of knowing my 1/4 acre lot 
>>>>> on
>>>>> the Shore of Lake Ozark will be evenly distributed amongst my children.
>>>>>
>>>> Thanks dad!
>>>
>>> I knew you were kooky.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi, Ying!
> 
> Hi Andrew!

So, what's happ'nin?


> 
>> -- 
>> ah 
> 
> 


-- 
ah