🚀 go-pugleaf

Michael Davis wrote:
> Art Deco wrote:
> > On 15 Jun 2006 14:57:32 GMT, paedophobic® latent fagboi John Gwiffin
> > <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>The pervert who wishes he were Art Deco took his hands off his
> >>neighbor's little kids long enough to this additional evidence of
> >>his illiteracy:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On 14 Jun 2006 16:17:59 GMT, paedophobic® latent fagboi John
> >>>Gwiffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Even more lame, ignorant, and imbecilic than he was yesterday,
> >>>>the child molester who wishes he could be Art Deco rewrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>...paedophobic®......paedophobic®......paedophobic®... etc.
> >>>>
> >>>>It has really been amusing watching to see how long it might
> >>>>take you to see how freakishly lame and totally fucking
> >>>>idiotic that is, child molester.  I'm not referring only to
> >>>>the desperate plea for attention and totally incongruous
> >>>>self-dramatization--the ® (although that certainly is the most
> >>>>telling part of it), since the meaningless construction itself
> >>>>is just another manifestation of a few of your inadequacies.
> >>>>It's hilarious that you always react to my neologisms with
> >>>>such a pathetic attempt to follow.  I know you're trying to
> >>>>ingratiate yourself in your desperate hope that I'll relent
> >>>>and let you suck my instrument, but still all I can do is to
> >>>>laugh at you.  I'm not feeling guilty yet about herding you
> >>>>into doing stuff like that to yourself, but I'm considering
> >>>>it.  (By the way, airhead, be sure to post the link to your
> >>>>evidence now that I've forced you to claim to have seen this
> >>>>paragraph before.  yuk yuk yuk)
> >>>
> >>>And I'm sure I'll see it again, Gwiffin!   Let's assign it a
> >>>number!
> >>
> >>One of the multitude of hilarious things about your idiotic
> >>fixation is that if you tried to number every unique thing I've
> >>slapped you with--and if you were even half the elementary school
> >>average in literacy you'd understand that they're all unique,
> >>your innumeracy would manifest itself as spectacularly as your
> >>illiteracy.  Your pretense of being able to count that high is
> >>one of the funniest of your failures.  How many little girls did
> >>you try to fondle today?  Hint: Every one you got close to--no
> >>need to try to count them.
> >>
> >>Another of the hilarious things about your idiotic fixation is
> >>the pretense that you could retain enough to recognize it if you
> >>did happen to see it again, even an hour later.
> >
> >
> > So which number shall we assign it, Gwiffin?
> >
> >
> >>>>Now jump through this hoop, ignorant doormat.  You have
> >>>>permission to whine about the fact that I wrote this in less
> >>>>time than it will take you to look up and copy and paste one
> >>>>of your feeble practiced lines.
> >>>
> >>>It's "practise" with an "s" when it's a verb,
> >>
> >>Child molester, even though everything you write is remarkably
> >>stupid, congratulations on what will undoubtedly be one of the
> >>stupidest bits posted in any of these newsgroups this week.  With
> >>that example of your illiteracy, you inadvertently provided an
> >>excuse for the fact that you're deathly afraid to try to dispute,
> >>refute, or even obliquely address any of the things that cause
> >>your tantrums here.
> >>
> >>Any time you disagree with me about a word, illiterate child
> >>molester, you have another learning opportunity.  I'll try to
> >>help you here again, mostly because the English lessons I've
> >>given you in the past have elicited such hilarious fulminations
> >>and flounces.
> >>
> >>First of all, the word I used 100% appropriately and 100%
> >>correctly above is not a verb.  It's an adjective. The average
> >>six-year-old, the object of your sexual desires, would have known
> >>that. (By the way, note that the fact that the average six-year-
> >>old is way ahead of you in knowledge and emotional development is
> >>not a valid excuse for your disgusting proclivities.)  Ask your
> >>other Remedial English teachers to tell you about adjectives.
> >>
> >>Second, the verb would be "practice" (my choice).  Even in the
> >>version of English used in England after all the intelligent
> >>people left for North America and Australia-- thereby stopping
> >>its evolution there in the inbred isles, there's no reason to use
> >>one alternate spelling for the noun and use the other for a verb.
> >>What a fucking idiotic idea.  If you'd spend less time trying to
> >>feel little kids' genitals and more time trying to learn from the
> >>lessons I and others try to get through your clue-repellent
> >>skull, you still wouldn't be able to learn elementary stuff like
> >>that, but I would have to commend you for your feeble efforts.
> >
> >
> > Far too long, fagboi.  Skipped.
> >
> >
> >>>Gwiffin, you
> >>>verbose yet illiterate faggot asshole.
> >>
> >><snicker>  If there were really irony meters, the factory would
> >>be flooded with orders for replacements after that snivelly,
> >>idiotic little tantrum.  It's funny as hell to watch you fail to
> >>realize that you have nothing to say but still continue with
> >>iteration after iteration of the same pathetic ribbittry, child
> >>molester.
> >>
> >>Anyway, your tantrum was funny.  That's why it's fun to spend a
> >>minute or two here helping you humiliate yourself.
> >
> >
> > That's apparently all it takes to pick a pre-recorded autorant,
> > Gwiffin!
> > <snigger>
> >
>
> Been away from Usenet a while. Just popped in for a visit. Question: Who
> is the kook socked up as John Griffin?

Dunno but he answers to the name of Gwiffo.