Article View: alt.bbs.waffle
Article #166Re: Waffle+X00 vs 486/50
From: david nugent
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 14:46
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 14:46
20 lines
1338 bytes
1338 bytes
zatar@dadstoy.uucp (Terry Stockdale) writes:
> I'm at the last stages of purchasing either a 486/33 or a 486/50. One of
> the major uses of the system will be running Waffle under DOS5 (or DRDOS6),
> along with the X00 FOSSIL. I do have a NS16550AFN on a board I'll transfer
^^^
> to the new machine.
>
> Does anyone know of any problems with Waffle/DOS or X00 with such a fast
> machine?
So long as it's an AFN, no problems. You may trip up on a 386+ with just the
16550A (no FN) though.
..............................................................................
david nugent Public Access Usenet "Only Nixon can go to China"
david@csource.oz.au +61-3-792-3507 - ancient Vulcan proverb
3:632/400@fidonet, 58:4100/1@intlnet, 199:4242/5@rainbownet, 33:300/6@admin
PO Box 260, Endeavour Hills, Victoria, Australia, 3802.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<kw78iB1w165w@csource.oz.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!jabaru.cec.edu.au!csource!davidReferences:
<3Zk5iB1w164w@dadstoy.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!jabaru.cec.edu.au!csource!david From: david@csource.oz.au (david nugent) Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle Subject: Re: Waffle+X00 vs 486/50 Message-ID: <kw78iB1w165w@csource.oz.au> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 00:46:43 +1000 References: <3Zk5iB1w164w@dadstoy.uucp> Reply-To: david@csource.oz.au Organization: Unique Computing Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia Lines: 20