Article View: alt.bbs.waffle
Article #86Re: Zmodem NOT recommended (was Re: f,e-protocol in 1.65)
From: Duane Davis
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 1992 16:34
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 1992 16:34
30 lines
2033 bytes
2033 bytes
pacolley@ember.UUCP (Paul Colley) writes: > However, most UUCP communication is unsupervised. Zmodem does not > require ANY ack's from the receiving system. Zmodem is quite > capable of thus continuing to dump data for hours into a system > that has hung, died, modem unplugged from computer, etc. > > Three window, 64-byte packet UUCP-g does far too many ack's at 9600 > baud, but going to no acks at all is not a great solution. > > Even for local calls, a hung recipient under Zmodem could tie up > the sending modem. And any replacement for UUCP-g that you propose > has to be acceptable to those who do long-distance transfers! I have been using Zmodem to transfer network traffic for a couple years now. Never have I had Zmodem hang or continue to send if the other system locks. I call Washington,DC daily from California in an unsupervised event. That's about as long distance as your gonna get without calling outside of the country. With Zmodem I get up to 1700 CPS. With UUCP-g I'm lucky to get 800 CPS on a large file, average transfer rate is lower than that. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Duane Davis - system operator system@micromed.net.netcom.com Micro-Medic Voice (408) 281-8434 474 Blossom Hill Road data (408) 280-1610 San Jose, CA 95123 alternate duaned@darkside.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- File Server - files@micromed.net.netcom.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<TJ3yiB1w165w@micromed.net.netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcomsv!micromed!systemReferences:
<2872@ember.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcomsv!micromed!system From: system@micromed.net.netcom.com (Duane Davis) Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle Subject: Re: Zmodem NOT recommended (was Re: f,e-protocol in 1.65) Message-ID: <TJ3yiB1w165w@micromed.net.netcom.com> Date: 9 Apr 92 16:34:16 GMT Article-I.D.: micromed.TJ3yiB1w165w References: <2872@ember.UUCP> Organization: Micro-Medic +1 408 280 1610 Lines: 30