Thread View: alt.bbs.waffle
9 messages
9 total messages
Started by dogbowl
Sun, 04 Oct 1992 14:00
alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Author: dogbowl
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1992 14:00
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1992 14:00
16 lines
1016 bytes
1016 bytes
I was under the impression that alt.bbs.waffle had been rmgrouped about 3 months ago, however I've started receiving messages intended for that group in my junk file over the last few days. Is alt.bbs.waffle dead and buried? I assumed it was, as comp.bbs.waffle is very much alive and kicking. Perhaps it's a zombie group. :-) dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz The Dawghaus BBS, Palmerston North, New Zealand (+64 6 357 9245)
Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Author: Bryan Hannahs
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1992 21:48
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1992 21:48
20 lines
1149 bytes
1149 bytes
dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz writes: > I was under the impression that alt.bbs.waffle had been rmgrouped about > 3 months ago, however I've started receiving messages intended for that > group in my junk file over the last few days. > > Is alt.bbs.waffle dead and buried? > > I assumed it was, as comp.bbs.waffle is very much alive and kicking. > > Perhaps it's a zombie group. :-) A few days after the rmgroup, someone sent a newgroup alt.bbs.waffle. Most of us just ignore it. --- "Man created God in his own image." - Lazarus Long Bryan Hannahs | a-dent@somenode.uucp a-dent@bluemoon.use.com (aka Arthur Dent) | bryan@bluemoon.use.com
Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Author: Michael P. Deignan
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 12:02
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 12:02
22 lines
1326 bytes
1326 bytes
a-dent@somenode.uucp (Bryan Hannahs) writes: >A few days after the rmgroup, someone sent a newgroup alt.bbs.waffle. >Most of us just ignore it. Unfortunately, sites running C-News will automatically create it. More than likely the culprit was Bruce Becker. The simple solution to bypassing a Becker-autonewgroup is to add the line: Path: becker!yoursite!yourname to your posting. This will "fool" the news software into thinking that it has already sent the posting to becker's site. Thus, he won't see it, and rmgroups that he can't see, he can't newgroup. MD -- -- Michael P. Deignan / Sex is hereditary. If your -- Domain: mpd@anomaly.sbs.com / parents never had it, chances -- UUCP: ...!uunet!rayssd!anomaly!mpd / are you won't either... -- Telebit: +1 401 455 0347 /
Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Author: moon!cyberden!system
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 22:12
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 22:12
10 lines
670 bytes
670 bytes
dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz writes: > Is alt.bbs.waffle dead and buried? Yes. __________________________________________________________________________ | / |\ | H E \ Y B E R |/ E N [ moon!cyberden!system@well.sf.ca.us ]
Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Author: Mikel Lechner
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1992 17:19
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1992 17:19
22 lines
1382 bytes
1382 bytes
In <1992Oct05.120201.17323@anomaly.sbs.risc.net> kd1hz@anomaly.sbs.risc.net (Michael P. Deignan) writes: >a-dent@somenode.uucp (Bryan Hannahs) writes: >>A few days after the rmgroup, someone sent a newgroup alt.bbs.waffle. >>Most of us just ignore it. >Unfortunately, sites running C-News will automatically create it. An even simpler solution for those running C-News: % delgroup alt.bbs.waffle % addgroup alt.bbs.waffle x This will send all the postings into the bit-bucket bypassing even "junk". It also eliminates the automatic newgroup problem, since the newsgroup is actually listed in the "active" file. I prefer this over aliasing, since the former leaves the old group name to live on forever. Case in point is: "comp.sys.ibm.hardware" which still receives 2-3 postings per day even tho' it's been replaced by "comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware". Sigh...
Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Author: Dale Weber
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 20:22
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 20:22
25 lines
1464 bytes
1464 bytes
dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz writes:
> I was under the impression that alt.bbs.waffle had been rmgrouped about
> 3 months ago, however I've started receiving messages intended for that
> group in my junk file over the last few days.
It wasn't actually regrouped at all. Another group was formed, and that
is comp.bbs.waffle. They are separate and I don't currently carry the
comp.bbs.waffle group here because of all the duplication there no doubt is
and will continue to be for sometime.
> Is alt.bbs.waffle dead and buried?
Nope. It's alive and well here and can stay right where it is as far as
I am concerned.
> I assumed it was, as comp.bbs.waffle is very much alive and kicking.
You know what they say about assumtions... ;-) ;-)
--
Internet: dalew@pdx.com (Waffle Beta Site) P r a i s e t h e
Home BBS: +1(503)335-9600 at 2400 - 9600 Bps [v.32bis] L o r d !
WORK: Northwest Analytical, Inc. - Home of:
Voice +1 (503) 224-7727 NWA Quality Analyst and NWA LIMS
Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Author: Bill Fenner
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 03:36
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 03:36
29 lines
1827 bytes
1827 bytes
In article <kgyHsB1w165w@twiki.PDX.COM> dalew@twiki.PDX.COM (Dale Weber) writes: | It wasn't actually regrouped at all. Another group was formed, and that |is comp.bbs.waffle. They are separate and I don't currently carry the |comp.bbs.waffle group here because of all the duplication there no doubt is |and will continue to be for sometime. Are you sure that someone up the line from you isn't aliasing comp.bbs.waffle to alt.bbs.waffle? On psuvax1, there have been 20 articles in alt.bbs.waffle in the last 10 days, most of which are talking about whether or not alt.bbs.waffle is dead. There are 351 articles in comp.bbs.waffle over that same 10-day time period. If you're posting to alt.bbs.waffle, you're doing yourself a disservice; lots less people read alt.bbs.waffle than comp.bbs.waffle . comp.bbs.waffle got 68% distribution in September's USENET readership report, as opposed to 54% for alt.bbs.waffle. |> Is alt.bbs.waffle dead and buried? | | Nope. It's alive and well here and can stay right where it is as far as |I am concerned. Why not alias it to vox.waffle, Dale? Then you can hang onto even *earlier* history. alt.bbs.waffle is essentially dead. If you want to hold on to it for your own reasons, go ahead, but don't try to get other people to. Bill
Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Author: Ellen Keyne Seebacher
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 17:12
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 17:12
13 lines
1295 bytes
1295 bytes
kd1hz@anomaly.sbs.risc.net (Michael P. Deignan) writes: >>A few days after the rmgroup, someone sent a newgroup alt.bbs.waffle. > >Unfortunately, sites running C-News will automatically create it. I beg your pardon: I run a C News site, and the previous admin had the brains to turn off automatic newgrouping years ago -- about the time of "talk.ketchup", "misc.sheep", and "alt.sex.aluminum.baseball.bat". Change that to "sites running C News whose admins don't give a @$%&..." -- Ellen Keyne Seebacher news@uchinews.uchicago.edu
Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Author: Michael P. Deignan
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 21:11
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 21:11
18 lines
1354 bytes
1354 bytes
elle@kimbark.uchicago.edu (Ellen Keyne Seebacher) writes: >I beg your pardon: I run a C News site, and the previous admin had the >brains to turn off automatic rmgrouping years ago -- about the time of >"talk.ketchup", "misc.sheep", and "alt.sex.aluminum.baseball.bat". C-News by default honors newgroups, and mails rmgroups to the news administrator. So, you previous site admin didn't "have the brains to turn off automatic rmgrouping years ago", c-news as supplies automatically does that anyway. MD -- -- Michael P. Deignan / Sex is hereditary. If your -- Domain: mpd@anomaly.sbs.com / parents never had it, chances -- UUCP: ...!uunet!rayssd!anomaly!mpd / are you won't either... -- Telebit: +1 401 455 0347 /
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads