🚀 go-pugleaf

It is absurd take seriously the possibility of clandestine weather
modification without also theorizing and guessing who might control such a
technology and why.

Subject:  Clandestine Weather Modification, Commodities Markets, global
organized crime, China's Princelings, and recent Presidential Pardons.

I am sending this rough, but essentially complete analysis to newsgroups. I
want it in many hands before anyone can react to quash it. A polished and
elaborated version will follow.
--------------------------

I am not sure that "New World Order" is a productive concept, since, like
the label "El Nino" in meteorology, the term encourages people to stop
looking for detail,  for controlling variables and relationships, merely to
settle on a near-meaningless blanket term  that does nothing but polarize
discussants.

The paragraphs below uncover a terrifying relationship among Clandestine
Weather Modification, Commodities Markets, global organized crime, China's
Princelings, and recent Presidential Pardons.

But first, let me illustrate how the public can be deceived by
disinformation campaigns --and "global warming" is a disinformation campaign
to cover CWM manipulations by organized crime of weather-sensitive
commodities markets -- campaigns to create a spurious "urgent good cause"
that compells legislatures and organizations, scientists and activists to
participate unknowingly in creating disasters for the clandestine purpose of
control agricultural commodities markets, futures markets, and the prices of
weather-sensitive derivatives and so forth. (Sorry about the slipshod
sentence structure -- I'm in a hurry.)

Let me illustrate this disinformation "spin" technique with the recent
national campaign against cigarettes:

The war on cigarettes was fought by a President and Justice Department owned
by

1.) drug lords,

2} the Chinese globial espionage apparatus that seeks to subvert nations
that give sociopathic Beijing Princelings an inferiority complex by deluging
those nations in illegal narcotics (a plan conceived by the late Zhou En-lai
in the early 1950's and never repudiated or discontinued);

3) lawyers who earn big  money defending drug criminals (Only small-time
drug pushers go to prison in the United States.) :

4) the "social services industry" (social workers, counselors,
psychologists, probation officers, treatment facilities) all of whom would
be out of jobs (with no skill that is marketable)if the people  suddenly
adopted middle-class anti-drug values and had bright prospects for a good
future  if they practice middle-class virtues.

It is rock-solid economics that if a "good" (like cigarettes)  becomes more
expensive and harder to get -- then suppliers of substitute goods (like
illegal narcotics) will enjoy an increase  in demand for their product,
i.e., a shift of the substitute product's demand curve to the right;
especially if the two "goods" are close substitutes. And of course since
drugs and cigarettes are both a means of coping with stress, of immediate
short-term relief and distraction from  situations they cannot escape and
don't know how to cope with (lacking culturally buttressed inner fortitude),
it follows that when  one of two ways out of immediate stress (cigarettes
and hard illegal narcotics) becomes harder to get, the other good, other
things being equal, will experience an increase in demand and usage.

And this is not refuted by the argument, "If that were true, Clinton would
have moved to legalize drugs."

If he did had then his sponsors (organized crime, China,  Cuba, and
Columbian narco-terror) would no longer enjoy their now-firmly established
monopoly position and monopoly revenues and profits.

(And yes, the CIA and Mossad are also benefactors of the drug trade -- but
keep in mind:  (1) the  Mossad operates in the U.S.A. on behalf of the CIA,
and (2) that the CIA is not an instrument of the American people (they know
nothjing of its agenda or its operations) and Mossad has nothing to do with
Jews or Israel (for the same reason)  -- they are the covert tools of
Pirates (merchant bankers, currency traders, and other big brokers and
dealers of Wall Street, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Frankfurt and The City (a
network of some the worlds richest families)-- an operating network  of
interests that goes back 500 years -- think of them as  history's East India
Tea Company  gone global.   (It was the East India company that pillaged
India and pummeled China with its opium trade and monopoly lock on east-west
commerce since the 19th century) -- and, I may as well add, this global
establishmentazzi will never be defeated without Jew and gentile uniting,
without Jews and Arabs of good will realizing the true instigators of their
antagonisms, without black and white, without yellow and brown --all
cooperating to defeat the establishmentazzi. (It will require a rebirth of
the common man's faith in the Common Man and acceptance of the principle
that "Every man is responsible to every other man." (Not likely  for today,
but not altogether hopeless either, if you can see past what the media toss
in our eyes.)

Now, with this orientation, let us take a look at some very bad news.

Connect Clinton, the CIA, the Chinese domination of the Chicago commodities
exchanges (biggest in the world), Hillary Clinton's impossible 30-million to
one killing in commodities from one investment (on her first and only try!),
and Clinton's recent pardoning of commodities traders--in particular, Marc
Rich, billionaire a Mossad agent who ammased over a billion dollars in
commodities, futures and derivatives markets even while a fugitive from
United States justice.
 (Do you really think that Marc Rich was such a resourceful entrepreneur and
servant of consumer sovereignty in the markets that he got that money by
promoting "better mousetraps?  Impossible!)

Add that matrix to this one:

Clandestine Weather Modification is being conducted in secret by rouge
agents within the U.S. government and other organizations, operations
concealed by a pseudo-scientific disinformation program -- the
"global-warming" scare that requires the complicity of individuals in the
leadership of many of the nations leading scientific and information
organizations, both public and private. The technology (involving the HAARP
system that projects energy off the ionosphere to heat cloud or affect other
wave patternings and particle energies influencing the biosphere --
effecting small perturbations at catastrophe-theoretic critical points that
result in vast changes in the convection cells of the atmosphere, oceans,
and sub-crust mantle --causing shifts in air and atmospheric moisture and
heat flows, shifts in ocean-surface currents, and earthquake shifts in the
earths crust, respectively. (reference below)

What has happened is that the services of a secret defense weapon (weather
modification) has been sold to organized crime and rogue factions of secret
government agencies -- Mossad and the "red" faction of the CIA; including, I
suspect, Marc Rich--and the People's Liberation Army (which is in fact the
Princeling's super-monopolistic transnational corporation and
"establishment" rolled into one.

Consider NASA's Earth Observing System (EOS) which provides Clandestine
Weather Modification with its real-time feedback on millions of atmospheric,
oceanic, and land variables, became operational at exactly the time that the
first multi-billion-dollar super disasters began occurring around the world.

Not even academia and the normal U.S. weather establishment receives the
satellite algorithms needed for receipt and analysis of EOS remote-sensing
data. Instead they receive pre-processed interpretations and color-coded
maps, i.e., pre-digested, "dumbed-down" and unverifiable computer-generated
"interpretation" of that data. Meanwhile the real-time on-line
remote-sensing algorithmic data is shared with Chinese researchers (the
People's Liberation Army) and the National Science Foundation (the
"establishment's secret chemistry set," in the same way the CIA is
capitalism's invisible army. Got to send this fast -- skip further
exposition -- here is a recent letter summarizing what I wanted to say:

Dear "Giles",

These are the right questions to ask.

Here are answers that so far satisfy me:

> Q1. Since such technology as you describe could
> only have been produced with the cognisance
> and co-operation of the G7 governments, why
> have we in Britain been having such bloody
> awful weather recently? I can't see any
> economic benefit for anyone resulting from this.
> All of the major banks and insurance
> companies, as well as the rest of industry, must
> have lost many millions of pounds as a result of
> the recent floods, not to mention the loss of life.

A: First the short answer: In an economic disaster assets are not destroyed,
they merely change hands. And even in physical disasters, some individuals
gain. (On a small scale think of arsonists and insurance. But on national
scales, think of thosewho will lend the money that will be needed to finance
rebuilding and to give emergency assistance.   Look at the politicians who
before the disaster had no influence with middle-class voters, who suddenly
have the tremendous power of the "carrot on a stick" in theform of disaster
aid "with strings." (In my own state forest fires were deliberately fought
in inept ways, because the economically distressed population knew that
there would be disaster aid.)

Elaboration of this concept:

It would be nice if everyone shared your understanding of Britain as having
one social welfare , one "common good" that Her Majesty's government
attempts to maximize "for the good of all" and so forth.

But age old is the problem of private interest and private power bending the
trajectory of the common good towards self-aggrandizement. I do not know
your politics, but I think it likely that you will agree that the common
good has often been betrayed for the benefit of powerful individuals.

I do not know if British history books recount the controversy of the "Corn
Laws" in exactly the same way American history books tell it -- but here is
a case in which the importation of corn from the United States was
deliberately restricted to raise prices of food grown by tenant farmers on
the landed estates -- so that the increased total revenues could then be
transferred to the landowners by means of correspondingly higher
rents --while many in Britain and Ireland went hungry and later starved --
and in the face of the greatest appeals to humanitarian considerations from
the mouths of Cobden and Bright and other liberals the House of Lords
persisted in "not seeing the point." Or consider the possibility that World
War One was allowed to continue in stalemate on the Western Front in order
that geopolitical objectives (the conquest of oil lands from the Ottoman
Turks) might be realized (and so we have the Gallipoli campaign and the
exploits of T. E. Lawrence); we have an American breakthrough -- German's
surrendering as soon as they knew it was Americans who were advancing, i.e.,
theAmericans "of the "Fourteen Points" -- actually called back and the
advancing Americans thrown into the Argon forests to keep the war from
ending, to keep the Americans from winning the show before the right time.

An American example: The richest families of the last 150 years made their
original fortunes in Civil War profiteering -- the Vanderbilts, Morgans,
Belmonts, Goulds, Astors, Harrimans, Davidsons, Villards, and Vanderlips
come to mind.  After the war they used that money to create monopolies. The
Spanish American war -- was simply another money maker cooked up for that
purpose only  (it may have been American- sent agents who blew up the
Battleship Maine in 1898). Note how the Federal income tax and the Federal
Reserve banking system came in 1913, under a President who was soon
promising to keep us outof  World War One -- but always refused to initiate
mediation! -- and only "forced himself to do the moral thing," i.e., enter
the insane war, when signals were received by Edward House from The City
through J.P. Morgan that the time was right.

You may also not know that Churchill and President Franklin Roosevelt were
intending to enter America in the European war begun in 1939, even as
Roosevelt was promising American mothers that "your boys will not go to
war."  Another feast for investment bankers who lend money to governments.

Furthermore, it was "conservative" Winston Churchill (according to John
Kenneth Galbraith, former Ambassador to the Court of St. James in the
Kennedy years) was "visiting" in the spectator's gallery of the New York
Stock Exchange at the exact moment of the October 29 crash! (The crash
"corrected" Churchill's error of setting the pound at its pre-WWI gold value
after the WWI-- the crash deflated the dollar --( a third of the money
supply was destroyed due to the crash and the "money-multiplier" effect --
but --supposing you could possibly believe any of this as I do -- consider
the scale of this tragedy that a secretive elite permitted to happen merely
to insure their own aggrandizement.

Some say that Kennedy was killed, that China was given to Mao (actually
pushed in his lap -- by deliberate economic and political sabotage of Chiang
Kai-shek) -- merely to secure continuance of the monopolistic economic power
of Hong Kong in china-west trade  (Hong Kong would not have been  be worth a
hill of beans had China been opened up on the principles conforming to the
economic doctrines of the Chicago School of Economics model in 1945 -- as
Chiang Kai-shek is said to have been intending (which explains the strong
opposition, even sabotage, he got from elite-family officials in the State
Department (especialy Gen. George C. Marshall).

The financial families that are so powerful today are unknown to you -- and
so when you try to imagine them to be motivated as you are, to share
yourideals and hopes for your country and for mankind.

But we are a species with as much variety of temperament as exists between
cocker spaniels and pit bulls -- and a cocker can't imagine the dreams and
schemes of a pit bull. I , an American mut raised in classless California in
the 1950's, for one, could never imagine this gulf to exist, until I saw if
first had in New Haven and later at Lake Forest and Westport.

I especially was deluded into thinking that the patriotism of the American
ruling class would be stronger and more systematic and thorough than that
found in middle America.

Then I saw Clinton -- and I had to ask how such a man with such a
temperament could possible pass muster with this nation's power brokers to
become President of the U.S.

(Tony Blair, in Britain,  is a much better politician than Clinton, simply
because he has not stirred up militias (and whatever I am) against his
agenda -- but he is working for the same "firm" Clinton has served so
faithfully -- Clinton kept all the promises to those he intended to keep
promises  to.  (In Britan, The City owns more control of the Labour Party
than organized labor itself (and of the Conservative Party than the
hereditary nobility, or so it appears to me fromYakima Washington), since
middle-class oriented Margaret Thatcher was put aside.

In my opinion, G7 leaders are all imposing-looking hand-picked yes
men --given the outward mantle of power and status -- in a charade to
impress and deceive the the little people.

(The U.S. is administered by top people all belonging to the Council on
Foreign Relations, a group founded by David Rockefeller in the 1930's to
represent American financial interests in the dominant American
institutions.

If the purpose of the CFR (and the Trilateral Commission and the
Bilderbergs, was really to promote the common good and elevate the
commonman) -- they would not resort to secrecy as they have.  In my keynote
ezboard essay, I described how powerful private interests gain from public
calamity.

> Q2. You mention "advanced radio physics"
> as a method of heating  large areas of land to
> produce massive thermals. Do you have any
> documentation to support this assertion?

A: Yes. At this web site of the man who shaped and headed the
still-very-much-with-us HAARP program: www.eastlundscience.com/currentd/html

Click on:  Item 3: Weather modification with high-power electro-magnetic
radiation"

> Q3: Are you in fact referring to the experiments in
> satellite-based microwave transmitters carried
> out by both the US and USSR in the late 80s?

Not to my knowledge.  I am referring to existing technology now in place in
Alaska -- and recently acknowledged albeit very vaguely and guardedly in the
magazine Popular Science by the head of the National Security Agency.
(HAARP, like area 51 is a subject of much speculation -- since both are
"above top secret" and that makes people suspicious and wary.

>Q4:  If this technology has been improved, mere
> weather modification might be the least of our
> problems. Anyone for orbital mind-control lasers?

A: Well if they have the power to get a system of mind control lazars up
there, then they don't need mind control lazars -- they already rule. (And
it is expensive to operate us all like so many synthetic warriors and
monsters in a Super Nintendo game.

Weather is a weapon of mass destruction. And the super rich have--since the
East India Company wasfirst chartered -- been extremely "Malthusian" in
their thinking. You and I, like Dicken's  Tiny Tim, arejust part of the ugly
unsustainable surplus. (It is this ideology that justifies their not wasting
their great capital accumulations for which they are "responsible", by
merely throwing it away inferiors who cannot check their own procreation and
who overburden the world's resources already etc. etc. and must be
compressed into cities so as not to bring down property values by spoiling
the natural scenery off the rich man's thousand acre terrace. (You have to
know that acceptance of "abortion on demand" began at the top -- since in
America fortunes are divided among all the heirs.)
>
> 3. I'm a little unclear on the motivations for
> whoever might be behind such a project.
> Surely you can't be suggesting that insurance
> companies are in the habit causing major
> disasters to undermine each other in some
> sort of global 'hostile takeover' game?

If you re-read the CWM-thesis paper, you will see that insurance companies
are mentioned as intended victims, not as the perpetrators. Their
accumulated capital competes with the loanable,capital of the merchant banks
and commercial banks.

And when the insurance companies are drained, the money goes to the
corporations that participate in the reconstruction -- and all of the
corruption, economic and political, attached to the awarding of those
contracts

> 4. My biggest problem is one which undermines
> all 'massive conspiracy' theories. As anyone
> who reads the newspapers knows, governments
> are notoriously bad at keeping secrets.

Yes, but investment bankers, currency traders, corporate CEO's, big lawyers
etc. are notoriously good at it. The government is not the agency doing it,
if it is being done. Governments are the organizations that the real elite
controls through private channels of influence. American sociologist , C.W.
Mills wrote the highly-respected analysis of the U.S. ruling class, called
"The Power Elite." Unfortunately the idea of governments working as the
civics text books discuss is just not true. The corruption is the real
purpose, the legitimate stuff is window dressing. (Sorry to break the news.)

> In every country, hardly a week goes by
> without some new political scandal resulting from
>someone saying the wrong  thing to the wrong person.
>Consequently I have difficulty in believing that
> any government could keep something as big as
>global clandestine weather modification a secret for
>decades. The same can be said of secret alien
> bases, the Ancient Order of Illuminati and the plot to
> assassinate JFK.
> However I still reckon Oswald was a patsy!

On all of this I agree. All of it. (See above.)
>
>
> Yours from England, where it's still raining...
>
.............
Thank you for the thought provoking questions.
.......
Your friend,
Dick Eastman

(I intend to polish this letter and post it ---- without your name, of
course. In the meantime feel free to use this draft as you wish.

See essays posted at www.rense.com and www.chemtrailcentral.com and to
several articles at ezboard: bclandestineweathermodification at
www.ezboard.com.  (None of these sites are in any way responsible for
oridentified with the views expressed in this post.  They allow anyone to
post on topics relating to the chemtrail question.)

Dick Eastman
Yakima
U.S.A.
Every man is responsible to every other man.