🚀 go-pugleaf

In <353C375B.6873@wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> Mike "Lousy" MacLennan
<defame@parasite.wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> grunts: 
>
>wilhelp@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>> 
>> Just when I begin to think a spineless loser like the phony-
>> named "Dave T" can go no lower, he surprises me.  Lately, I
>> have noticed that this gutless wonder has desperately turned to
>> e-mail flaming in the hope that I will continue to recognize
>> his miserable existence. 
>
>Proof please.

I doubt very seriously that the loser will deny it.
He knows better.  And I am certainly not going to 
post anything at the request of an ignorant, dishonest 
misfit such as the Lousy MacLouse-monkey Clone.

Oh, yes.  And, suspicially like the Louse-monkey Hausmann, 
Lousy plays his usual "distort their words out of context"
game:

>     Don't bother asking me to "post proof" for my "suspicians"; 
>     THAT is the sort of unreasonable request favored by the 
>     "Louse-monkeys" and the "Lousy MacLemons" (providing
>      they are indeed different crude entities) of the net.

I said it.  I stand by it one-hundred percent, even 
though I remind readers you have snipped out plenty
of helpful context, Lousy.   You STILL sound suspicially
like "crude entity" Louse-monkey Hausmann, as a matter
of fact, right down to your playing the same "snip and 
distort" game Hausmann favors!  Now, swear on your 
grandmother's false teeth again that you are not the 
Louse-monkey you grunt exactly like...
>  
>Biil Palmer chiding others for daring to ask him to back up
> his arguments in <65acb7$drn@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>

Lying again, eh Lousy?  The context you snipped made it
clear my point was that I don't feel obligated to "post
proof" about every reasonable suspician I have about
dishonest losers such as you and your Louse-monkey clone.


copyright FLAME GIANT

               On Wordscreens of the World