Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #116Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco
From: DevilsPGD
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:26
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:26
28 lines
2787 bytes
2787 bytes
In message <3t2356h5420lsqfvhe1h5cp12nnqt9vk59@4ax.com> John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> was claimed to have wrote: >On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 05:41:02 -0700, in ><4c5176da$0$22167$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>, SMS ><scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: > >>David Kaye wrote: >> >>> Yeah, I know that it's nice to have good cell coverage, but the antennas are >>> unsightly. Especially in a city such as SF where people are proud of the >>> architecture and the views, hanging antennas on the sides of buildings makes >>> them really really ugly. >> >>I was at a meeting where T-Mobile was given approval for a rooftop >>antenna with the only caveat being that they had to shield the equipment >>(not the tower) from view from the nearby neighborhood. They refused. >> >>The early carriers (who eventually morphed into Verizon and AT&T) have >>the advantage of having been able to install lots of towers before >>neighborhoods realized what was happening, in addition to the advantage >>of being on 800 MHz not 1900 MHz. > >There is no such advantage, as the citations I've posted make clear. So you're saying that all other things being equal, a 800MHz signal and a 1900MHz signal will penetrate typical buildings and other structures equally?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1fj3565k3evc6jje3ij8shhfkftbgp6et6@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<3uol16l2chdrcbl07a853mq1s8j88tqeav@4ax.com> <hnd346hrhipdljp6mgqcc6s2ii21mpk742@4ax.com> <cj99469087mt6pgfm2nic3hlk32q7v0ogl@4ax.com> <mhtp46910o69euklvbmhn4ugurpu0edsk0@4ax.com> <enhr4650gjv4lg4nk4jopk4b17jh4htu0c@4ax.com> <0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <i2r9q0$el1$1@news.eternal-september.org> <4c5176da$0$22167$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <3t2356h5420lsqfvhe1h5cp12nnqt9vk59@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,f35d7f214e6ebb35 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,5dc541db3c8c4527 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,e5f42faf3ca79ee X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gide43d82042,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: DevilsPGD <Still-Just-A-Rat-In-A-Cage@crazyhat.net> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet Subject: Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:26:13 -0700 Organization: Disorganized Lines: 28 Message-ID: <1fj3565k3evc6jje3ij8shhfkftbgp6et6@4ax.com> References: <3uol16l2chdrcbl07a853mq1s8j88tqeav@4ax.com> <hnd346hrhipdljp6mgqcc6s2ii21mpk742@4ax.com> <cj99469087mt6pgfm2nic3hlk32q7v0ogl@4ax.com> <mhtp46910o69euklvbmhn4ugurpu0edsk0@4ax.com> <enhr4650gjv4lg4nk4jopk4b17jh4htu0c@4ax.com> <0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <i2r9q0$el1$1@news.eternal-september.org> <4c5176da$0$22167$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <3t2356h5420lsqfvhe1h5cp12nnqt9vk59@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 57KnTDLB0p6GGtQ9lcKpigOht0sOOXvIa7mPvLv7Rsiyf5mulo Cancel-Lock: sha1:4dEyC/MxiuNzIfDl61jX5WDq6WA= X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186