Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #124Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco
From: John Navas
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:56
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:56
30 lines
2897 bytes
2897 bytes
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:32:21 -0500, in <9q3456lmbalk3gc9f7uk1imahr3p08s2gq@4ax.com>, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: >On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:17:42 GMT, malch@malch.com (Malcolm Hoar) >wrote: > >>In article <i2sntq$udo$1@news.eternal-september.org>, sfdavidkaye2@yahoo.com (David Kaye) wrote: >> >>>This didn't happen in Loma Prieta, even though the entirety of SF lost power >>>for 36 hours. >> >>It may not have collapsed but it wasn't exactly working well >>either. Yes, of course, something like that provokes a >>massive surge in call volume at the worst possible time. >> >>It took my Bay Area colleages many, many hours to get a message >>to me overseas; cellphone to NY and then conventional service >>from NY to London. > >Which cell phone, and which provider, was able to reach New York from >the Bay Area? I want one of those. <http://tinyurl.com/24st3gx> -- John "Assumption is the mother of all screw ups." [Wethern๏ฟฝs Law of Suspended Judgement]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<s85456lfj1tk2q53nc56581ol1pdo59jod@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <Xns9DC38F616A32Anoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i2ratc$tt7$1@news.eternal-september.org> <slrni52s9n.3sf.dcferguson@akit-ferguson.com> <3723561um0afo49klm46v2hd0cftv2s02h@4ax.com> <WYg4o.45954$YX3.29653@newsfe18.iad> <higgy-3793A3.12250429072010@news.announcetech.com> <i2sntq$udo$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i2t26m1419c002malch@news.sonic.net> <9q3456lmbalk3gc9f7uk1imahr3p08s2gq@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,f35d7f214e6ebb35 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: f9250,5dc541db3c8c4527 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,5dc541db3c8c4527 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,e5f42faf3ca79ee X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gid5695fe328a,gide43d82042,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet Subject: Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:56:26 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: <s85456lfj1tk2q53nc56581ol1pdo59jod@4ax.com> References: <0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <Xns9DC38F616A32Anoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i2ratc$tt7$1@news.eternal-september.org> <slrni52s9n.3sf.dcferguson@akit-ferguson.com> <3723561um0afo49klm46v2hd0cftv2s02h@4ax.com> <WYg4o.45954$YX3.29653@newsfe18.iad> <higgy-3793A3.12250429072010@news.announcetech.com> <i2sntq$udo$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i2t26m1419c002malch@news.sonic.net> <9q3456lmbalk3gc9f7uk1imahr3p08s2gq@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:56:24 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="Z69Ylg5oWFjLftPdMfPgDA"; logging-data="21123"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/zjum+BiUBeHRpiwa4ji+2" X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186 Cancel-Lock: sha1:eR/XvngSGAnxxM90MqdJaQaPNQg=