Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #160Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
From: John Navas
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:03
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:03
50 lines
3314 bytes
3314 bytes
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:36:09 -0700, in <n8mp36p6tkg5ckfvu9ufnlk0vi04tlp04k@4ax.com>, John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote: >On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:11:44 -0700, in ><o3ep36h0p80msjrgp2fs311at59hiu27he@4ax.com>, Jeff Liebermann ><jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:54:04 -0700, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> >>wrote: >> >>>In article <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad>, John Slade >>><hhitman86@pacbell.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Yea it's clear from Youtube videos and tests like the one >>>> from CR that the iPhone 4 has a hardware problem when it comes >>>> to the antenna. >>> >>>touch any phone's antenna, watch what happens. >> >>Did you actually try it? I did with several phones that have >>projecting antennas. LG VX8000, VX8100, and VX8300 on Verizon >>(900MHz). Also, Motorola RAZR V3m. I can wrap my hand around the >>antenna and get maybe a -4dB drop (about 1 bar). A 1900Mhz PCS phone >>will probably have a larger drop. >> >>Might as well try it right now.... Going into field test mode, and >>making a call. Rx power = -75dBm. Wrap my hand around the antenna, >>and it drops to -78dBm (average). Not much but enough to drop a call >>if I'm in a marginal area. Now, compare that to the iPhone 4 drop of >>about 30dB. >> >>Try it: >><www.wpsantennas.com/pdf/testmode/FieldTestModes.pdf> > >T-Mobile myTouch 3G 3.5mm Jack (aka HTC Magic, Android 1.6) >No case. Signal strength unaffected by holding it in any >way I can think of. I've since determined that this was due to being in a strong signal area. When the signal is strong, the phone won't show any drop in signal strength no matter how you hold it. It's only in a weak signal area where it will show a drop, on the order of about 6 dB for either hand, no matter how the phone is gripped. -- John "Assumption is the mother of all screw ups." [Wethern๏ฟฝs Law of Suspended Judgement]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2jom46h04hohic3nft0bq85s6ta4brpat0@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <120720101354048311%nospam@nospam.invalid> <o3ep36h0p80msjrgp2fs311at59hiu27he@4ax.com> <n8mp36p6tkg5ckfvu9ufnlk0vi04tlp04k@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:03:21 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 50 Message-ID: <2jom46h04hohic3nft0bq85s6ta4brpat0@4ax.com> References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <120720101354048311%nospam@nospam.invalid> <o3ep36h0p80msjrgp2fs311at59hiu27he@4ax.com> <n8mp36p6tkg5ckfvu9ufnlk0vi04tlp04k@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="Z69Ylg5oWFjLftPdMfPgDA"; logging-data="27232"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+aI7LdtxYFUppSSG1CfwVQ" X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186 Cancel-Lock: sha1:LHEn1WiOydk6kYi32iuQSCFCIqc=