Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #164Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco
From: Char Jackson
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:38
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:38
36 lines
3054 bytes
3054 bytes
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:22:46 -0700, Robert Higgins <robert@nospam.bogus> wrote: >Last time on alt.cellular.attws, John Navas ><spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> said: > >>On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:32:21 -0500, in >><9q3456lmbalk3gc9f7uk1imahr3p08s2gq@4ax.com>, Char Jackson >><none@none.invalid> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:17:42 GMT, malch@malch.com (Malcolm Hoar) >>>wrote: >>> >>>>In article <i2sntq$udo$1@news.eternal-september.org>, sfdavidkaye2@yahoo.com (David Kaye) wrote: >>>> >>>>>This didn't happen in Loma Prieta, even though the entirety of SF lost power >>>>>for 36 hours. >>>> >>>>It may not have collapsed but it wasn't exactly working well >>>>either. Yes, of course, something like that provokes a >>>>massive surge in call volume at the worst possible time. >>>> >>>>It took my Bay Area colleages many, many hours to get a message >>>>to me overseas; cellphone to NY and then conventional service >>>>from NY to London. >>> >>>Which cell phone, and which provider, was able to reach New York from >>>the Bay Area? I want one of those. >> >><http://tinyurl.com/24st3gx> > >Iridium phones use satellites, not cellular radio. > >It is, therefore, not a cell phone. He's apparently not familiar with the technology.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<pdl5569bc02geib4j11qdnh835ja54vl36@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<Xns9DC38F616A32Anoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i2ratc$tt7$1@news.eternal-september.org> <slrni52s9n.3sf.dcferguson@akit-ferguson.com> <3723561um0afo49klm46v2hd0cftv2s02h@4ax.com> <WYg4o.45954$YX3.29653@newsfe18.iad> <higgy-3793A3.12250429072010@news.announcetech.com> <i2sntq$udo$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i2t26m1419c002malch@news.sonic.net> <9q3456lmbalk3gc9f7uk1imahr3p08s2gq@4ax.com> <s85456lfj1tk2q53nc56581ol1pdo59jod@4ax.com> <6fk556pp087fb0pie5tr8tqvu7nehnq7v5@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,f35d7f214e6ebb35 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: f9250,5dc541db3c8c4527 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,5dc541db3c8c4527 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,e5f42faf3ca79ee X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gid5695fe328a,gide43d82042,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet Subject: Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco Message-ID: <pdl5569bc02geib4j11qdnh835ja54vl36@4ax.com> References: <Xns9DC38F616A32Anoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i2ratc$tt7$1@news.eternal-september.org> <slrni52s9n.3sf.dcferguson@akit-ferguson.com> <3723561um0afo49klm46v2hd0cftv2s02h@4ax.com> <WYg4o.45954$YX3.29653@newsfe18.iad> <higgy-3793A3.12250429072010@news.announcetech.com> <i2sntq$udo$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i2t26m1419c002malch@news.sonic.net> <9q3456lmbalk3gc9f7uk1imahr3p08s2gq@4ax.com> <s85456lfj1tk2q53nc56581ol1pdo59jod@4ax.com> <6fk556pp087fb0pie5tr8tqvu7nehnq7v5@4ax.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 37 X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy! X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly. Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:38:21 -0500