Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco

Article View: alt.cellular.attws

Article #166

Back to alt.cellular.attws Previous Next

#166

From: John Navas
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:00

35 lines
3064 bytes

On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:51:56 -0700, in
<80j456thfvp9avobns8trsijet3r3spn40@4ax.com>, mark <markr@mbrnet.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:47:35 -0700, John Navas
><spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:45:31 -0500, in
>><j484565pvmuitlvenu30dio3s73q7bklbj@4ax.com>, Char Jackson
>><none@none.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:56:26 -0700, John Navas
>>><spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

>>>><http://tinyurl.com/24st3gx>
>>>
>>>Thanks, but I don't consider that a cell phone.
>>
>>Perhaps you should broaden your horizons.  ;)
>
>Shoot John I had a sat phone when i was in the navy in 1973, and they
>do work great. Especially when your Uncle Sam pays the bill

The cost has come down considerably, making it a practical option for
many situations where safety is important, such as offshore boating and
hiking in remote areas.  PLB is another good safety option, but lacks
the two-way communications capability of sat phone.  Likewise SPOT.
All are far better than cellular in an emergency, particularly sat
phone.

-- 
John

"Facts? We ain't got no facts. We don't need no facts. I don't have
to show you any stinking facts!"  [with apologies to John Huston]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <agm556l18hqlmj9i74mhr5eet09m56bqd1@4ax.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail

References:

<3723561um0afo49klm46v2hd0cftv2s02h@4ax.com> <WYg4o.45954$YX3.29653@newsfe18.iad> <higgy-3793A3.12250429072010@news.announcetech.com> <i2sntq$udo$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i2t26m1419c002malch@news.sonic.net> <9q3456lmbalk3gc9f7uk1imahr3p08s2gq@4ax.com> <s85456lfj1tk2q53nc56581ol1pdo59jod@4ax.com> <j484565pvmuitlvenu30dio3s73q7bklbj@4ax.com> <h9f456506qmkd5o9f4nlkuqjvu3hr22mac@4ax.com> <80j456thfvp9avobns8trsijet3r3spn40@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 110038,f35d7f214e6ebb35
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: f9250,5dc541db3c8c4527
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,5dc541db3c8c4527
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fa874,e5f42faf3ca79ee
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gid5695fe328a,gide43d82042,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet
Subject: Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:00:28 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <agm556l18hqlmj9i74mhr5eet09m56bqd1@4ax.com>
References: <3723561um0afo49klm46v2hd0cftv2s02h@4ax.com> <WYg4o.45954$YX3.29653@newsfe18.iad> <higgy-3793A3.12250429072010@news.announcetech.com> <i2sntq$udo$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i2t26m1419c002malch@news.sonic.net> <9q3456lmbalk3gc9f7uk1imahr3p08s2gq@4ax.com> <s85456lfj1tk2q53nc56581ol1pdo59jod@4ax.com> <j484565pvmuitlvenu30dio3s73q7bklbj@4ax.com> <h9f456506qmkd5o9f4nlkuqjvu3hr22mac@4ax.com> <80j456thfvp9avobns8trsijet3r3spn40@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:00:18 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0N80NzQa/8+7JzQ8kHrVvQ";
 logging-data="3515"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+sDgkAzShqsBNgUVTMOyi0"
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KdXzOblFYRLhHXLd7jdqDvFV+0w=

Reply to Parent Message