Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #176Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco
From: John Higdon
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:54
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:54
23 lines
2663 bytes
2663 bytes
In article <i2ubtr$t96$2@news.eternal-september.org>, sfdavidkaye2@yahoo.com (David Kaye) wrote: > Sure, it was hard to get dialtone, but it worked for us. I suggest that it > wasn't the infrastructure that failed but the overloading. Of course it was the overloading. Failure is failure. > Considering that I > was there (in SF) and you weren't, I'd rely more on experience than on yours. San Francisco could not be reached for hours after the earthquake. The failure was either in San Bernardino county or it was in the San Francisco area. I know where I'm putting my money. > I'm wondering how many hams had/have backup power for their rigs. My hand is raised. -- John Higdon +1 408 ANdrews 6-4400 AT&T-Free At Last
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<higgy-986D3C.08540630072010@news.announcetech.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad!not-for-mailReferences:
<3uol16l2chdrcbl07a853mq1s8j88tqeav@4ax.com> <hnd346hrhipdljp6mgqcc6s2ii21mpk742@4ax.com> <cj99469087mt6pgfm2nic3hlk32q7v0ogl@4ax.com> <mhtp46910o69euklvbmhn4ugurpu0edsk0@4ax.com> <enhr4650gjv4lg4nk4jopk4b17jh4htu0c@4ax.com> <0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <Xns9DC38F616A32Anoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i2ratc$tt7$1@news.eternal-september.org> <slrni52s9n.3sf.dcferguson@akit-ferguson.com> <3723561um0afo49klm46v2hd0cftv2s02h@4ax.com> <WYg4o.45954$YX3.29653@newsfe18.iad> <higgy-3793A3.12250429072010@news.announcetech.com> <i2sntq$udo$1@news.eternal-september.org> <higgy-ABE0C1.23345229072010@news.announcetech.com> <i2ubtr$t96$2@news.eternal-september.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,f35d7f214e6ebb35 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: f9250,5dc541db3c8c4527 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,5dc541db3c8c4527 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,e5f42faf3ca79ee X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gid5695fe328a,gide43d82042,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad!not-for-mail From: John Higdon <higgy@kome.com> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet Subject: Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco Organization: Technological Extortion Studies References: <3uol16l2chdrcbl07a853mq1s8j88tqeav@4ax.com> <hnd346hrhipdljp6mgqcc6s2ii21mpk742@4ax.com> <cj99469087mt6pgfm2nic3hlk32q7v0ogl@4ax.com> <mhtp46910o69euklvbmhn4ugurpu0edsk0@4ax.com> <enhr4650gjv4lg4nk4jopk4b17jh4htu0c@4ax.com> <0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <Xns9DC38F616A32Anoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i2ratc$tt7$1@news.eternal-september.org> <slrni52s9n.3sf.dcferguson@akit-ferguson.com> <3723561um0afo49klm46v2hd0cftv2s02h@4ax.com> <WYg4o.45954$YX3.29653@newsfe18.iad> <higgy-3793A3.12250429072010@news.announcetech.com> <i2sntq$udo$1@news.eternal-september.org> <higgy-ABE0C1.23345229072010@news.announcetech.com> <i2ubtr$t96$2@news.eternal-september.org> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:54:08 -0700 Message-ID: <higgy-986D3C.08540630072010@news.announcetech.com> X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 237.sub-75-243-141.myvzw.com X-Authenticated-User: john Lines: 23 X-Complaints-To: abuse@newshosting.com